2010
DOI: 10.5751/es-03290-150103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Forest Management: an Example from India

Abstract: Many forest communities possess considerable knowledge of the natural resources they use. Such knowledge can potentially inform scientific approaches to management, either as a source of baseline data to fill information gaps that cannot otherwise be addressed or to provide alternative management approaches from which scientists and managers might learn. In general, however, little attention has been given to the relevance of quantitative forms of such knowledge for resource management. Much discussion has foc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
60
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…TEK has been suggested as a holistic management tool (Berkes et al 2000), but practical approaches have rarely been implemented because of a general underestimation of the relevance of this kind of information. As a consequence, less attention has been paid to the importance of identifying specific areas where some management strategies might be useful and areas where they could be problematic (Rist et al 2010). Thus, as Davis and Ruddle (2010) argue, it is necessary to exercise rational skepticism throughout the research on empirical ecological knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TEK has been suggested as a holistic management tool (Berkes et al 2000), but practical approaches have rarely been implemented because of a general underestimation of the relevance of this kind of information. As a consequence, less attention has been paid to the importance of identifying specific areas where some management strategies might be useful and areas where they could be problematic (Rist et al 2010). Thus, as Davis and Ruddle (2010) argue, it is necessary to exercise rational skepticism throughout the research on empirical ecological knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masyarakat lokal sekitar hutan berinteraksi dengan hutan sejak ratusan tahun memiliki pengetahuan mengenai bagaimana menggunakan tumbuhan hutan secara berkelanjutan (Pei et al 2009;Pei 2013). Masyarakat lokal dan pengetahuan mereka tentang hutan merupakan hal yang penting dalam praktik konservasi kawasan lindung (Anderson & Putz 2002;Junior & Sato 2005;Rist et al 2010). Pengelolaan sebuah kawasan konservasi harus menekankan pada aspek budaya yang berhubungan dengan keanekaragaman hayati (Muhumuza & Balkwill 2013).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…There is no consensus regarding use of the term "indigenous" versus "traditional" when describing the place-based knowledge systems of peoples intimately connected to their surrounding environment (Sefa Dei et al 2000, Houde 2007, Berkes 2008, Rist et al 2010, Pierotti 2011. As is most common in the literature, we use the term "indigenous knowledge" when referencing the broad range of knowledge held by indigenous people, whereas we use "traditional ecological knowledge" (TEK) and "traditional phenological knowledge" (TPK) when referencing ecological and phenological subsets of IK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%