1977
DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90325-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the Gompertz curve in an analysis of the dynamics of lizard tail regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth of the regenerating tail has also been explored (Cox, 1969;Baranowitz et al, 1977), but little attention has been paid to the growth of the intact original tail, although its morphology has been documented in a general way in various anatomical descriptions, and in a more specific way in more focused investigations (Etheridge, 1967;Mufti & Hafiz, 1972;Barbadillo & Martínez-Solano, 2002). Growth of the entire original tail has been addressed by some authors (Garland, 1985;Bates, 1989), but only recently (Bergmann & Russell, 2001) have patterns of growth within this segmentally arranged appendage been quantified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Growth of the regenerating tail has also been explored (Cox, 1969;Baranowitz et al, 1977), but little attention has been paid to the growth of the intact original tail, although its morphology has been documented in a general way in various anatomical descriptions, and in a more specific way in more focused investigations (Etheridge, 1967;Mufti & Hafiz, 1972;Barbadillo & Martínez-Solano, 2002). Growth of the entire original tail has been addressed by some authors (Garland, 1985;Bates, 1989), but only recently (Bergmann & Russell, 2001) have patterns of growth within this segmentally arranged appendage been quantified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caudal autotomy in lizards has been the focus of many studies (reviewed by Bellairs & Bryant, 1985), with aspects of morphology (Bryant & Bellairs, 1967;Cox, 1969;Baranowitz, 1977;Salthe & Maderson, 1977;Russell & Bauer, 1992;Arnold, 1994) and ecology (Vitt, Congdon & Dickson, 1977;Arnold, 1984;Dial & Fitzpatrick, 1984;Jaksic & Greene, 1984;Zani, 1996) constituting the majority. Growth of the regenerating tail has also been explored (Cox, 1969;Baranowitz et al, 1977), but little attention has been paid to the growth of the intact original tail, although its morphology has been documented in a general way in various anatomical descriptions, and in a more specific way in more focused investigations (Etheridge, 1967;Mufti & Hafiz, 1972;Barbadillo & Martínez-Solano, 2002). Growth of the entire original tail has been addressed by some authors (Garland, 1985;Bates, 1989), but only recently (Bergmann & Russell, 2001) have patterns of growth within this segmentally arranged appendage been quantified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%