1998
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of semi-automated fluorescent microsatellite analysis for tomato cultivar identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
47
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty-six SSR markers were used in this population, including SSR11, SSR14, SSR22, SSR27, SSR32, SSR38, SSR40, SSR45, SSR52, SSR74, SSR86, SSR115, SSR135, SSR248, SSR320, SSR356 (Sol Genomics Network at www.sgn.cornell.edu; Table 1); LE20592, LECAB9, LECHI3, LECHSOD, LEHMG2A, LEILV1B, LESODB, LESSF, LEWIPIG (Smulders et al 1997), LED10, LEE102 (Bredemeijer et al 1998); TMS22, TMS48 (Areshchenkova and Ganal 1999); STRBCS1b (Sandbrink et al 2000); EST245053, Theor Appl Genet (2007) 114:439-450 441 EST253712, EST259379 (Areshchenkova and Ganal 2002) and three new SSRs: LEB147, LED6, and S75487 (Table 1). PCR were done in 20-ll volumes containing 10 ng of genomic DNA, 0.2 lM each of forward and reverse primers, 2 ll of 10· Goldstar reaction buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1 mM each of dNTP, and 0.4 U of GoldstarTaq DNA polymerase (Eurogentec, Maastricht, The Netherlands).…”
Section: Dna Isolation and Marker Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-six SSR markers were used in this population, including SSR11, SSR14, SSR22, SSR27, SSR32, SSR38, SSR40, SSR45, SSR52, SSR74, SSR86, SSR115, SSR135, SSR248, SSR320, SSR356 (Sol Genomics Network at www.sgn.cornell.edu; Table 1); LE20592, LECAB9, LECHI3, LECHSOD, LEHMG2A, LEILV1B, LESODB, LESSF, LEWIPIG (Smulders et al 1997), LED10, LEE102 (Bredemeijer et al 1998); TMS22, TMS48 (Areshchenkova and Ganal 1999); STRBCS1b (Sandbrink et al 2000); EST245053, Theor Appl Genet (2007) 114:439-450 441 EST253712, EST259379 (Areshchenkova and Ganal 2002) and three new SSRs: LEB147, LED6, and S75487 (Table 1). PCR were done in 20-ll volumes containing 10 ng of genomic DNA, 0.2 lM each of forward and reverse primers, 2 ll of 10· Goldstar reaction buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1 mM each of dNTP, and 0.4 U of GoldstarTaq DNA polymerase (Eurogentec, Maastricht, The Netherlands).…”
Section: Dna Isolation and Marker Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This narrow diversity makes it difficult to identify molecular markers that are polymorphic in modern breeding material. However, a number of polymorphic microsatellite markers generated from database sequences have been successfully used for genotyping tomato cultivars and accessions (He et al, 2003;Smulders et al, 1997;Bredemeijer et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely accepted that SSR techniques are expensive if the sequence information for designing the primers has not yet been developed. However, for the tomato, the primer sets for SSR analysis have already been developed (Smulders et al, 1997;Bredemeijer et al, 1998;He et al, 2003). Besides, SSR has recently produced highly informative genotyping sets in other crops, such as leafy brassicas (Celucia et al, 2009), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este proceso de difusión sometió al tomate a una fuerte presión de selección, provocando el fenómeno genético conocido como "cuello de botella", que redujo extraordinariamente la variación genética de esta hortaliza (Rick, 1976;Rick y Yoder, 1978). Este hecho queda demostrado por la escasa presencia de polimorfismo en los cultivares europeos, respecto a los regionales de Sur América, Centro América y México (Miller y Tanksley, 1990;Williams y St. Clair, 1993;Smulders et al, 1997;Bredemeijer et al, 1998).…”
Section: 2 Difusión Del Tomateunclassified
“…Además la diversidad genética total, Ht, mayor para el conjunto de entradas de México (0.28 ) que para las de España (0.21), apoyarían la existencia del cuello de botella debido al transporte de un número limitado de entradas desde México a España, a partir de donde se inició su difusión por Europa. Este hecho ha quedado también demostrado por la escasa presencia de polimorfismo en los cultivares europeos respecto a los regionales de Sudamérica, Centroamérica y México (Millar y Tanksley, 1990;Williams y St. Clair, 1993;Smulders et al, 1997;Bredemeijer et al, 1998).…”
Section: Iii-2unclassified