2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.06430.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of robotically assisted surgery for treating urachal anomalies

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To report the management of urachal anomalies using a robotically assisted approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2005 and February 2006, five patients (mean age 51 years, range 24–68) were diagnosed with urachal anomalies. Two basic robot‐assisted surgical approaches were used for excising the urachal anomalies: excision of the urachal remnant via partial cystectomy, and radical cystectomy for excision of urachal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS All five cases were successful and the excised specimen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the report of Madeb et al [6]. We performed segmentary bladder resection because of evidence indicating communication between the bladder and the urachus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in agreement with the report of Madeb et al [6]. We performed segmentary bladder resection because of evidence indicating communication between the bladder and the urachus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, Madeb et al [6] reported their experience of robotically assisted surgery for treating urachal anomalies. They listed a number of advantages that were associated with the use of a robot, namely that it was possible to visualize the region of interest in a three-dimensional fashion, dexterity was improved, ergonomics were excellent, and there was minimal difficulty in performing intracorporeal suturing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since first application of minimally invasive technique in 1992, we found 90 cases in the literature of successful laparoscopic resection of urachal remnant in adults [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Robotic-assisted approach [11] and single incision laparoscopy [21,22] have been reported with equal to conventional laparoscopy success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The persistence of the urachal lumen manifests in several clinical presentations, of which recurrent periumbilical discharge is the most common [9], following by abdominal mass. Very rare other clinical scenarios have been described, including urachal carcinoma [10,11], colo-urachalcutaneous fistula [12] and small bowel obstruction [13]. Diagnosis of the persistent urachal remnant could be challenging and first of all requires a thorough history and physical examination [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%