2020
DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2020.1841904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of Public Interest Arguments in the European Accounting Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Debates about objectives of CbCR are related to but distinct from understandings about how CbCR relates to understandings of accounting's link to the public interest (Neu & Graham, 2005;DiFabio, 2020) or the construction of interests in accounting regulation (Robson, 1993). The responses of the regulatory bodies we study highlight CbCR as speaking to interests outside of the appropriate range of actors participating in and benefiting from accounting regulator's work and suggest that pressures to act on CbCR deriving from such interests are irrelevant.…”
Section: Constructing Appropriate Interests and Excluding Alternative...mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Debates about objectives of CbCR are related to but distinct from understandings about how CbCR relates to understandings of accounting's link to the public interest (Neu & Graham, 2005;DiFabio, 2020) or the construction of interests in accounting regulation (Robson, 1993). The responses of the regulatory bodies we study highlight CbCR as speaking to interests outside of the appropriate range of actors participating in and benefiting from accounting regulator's work and suggest that pressures to act on CbCR deriving from such interests are irrelevant.…”
Section: Constructing Appropriate Interests and Excluding Alternative...mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For instance, the SEC discursively shifted the focus away from extractive firms, their social impacts, and wider conceptions of risk. This is despite accounting for extractive firms emphasizes the inseparability of politically and socially sensitive risks that investors now worry about in relation to the extractive sector (Healy & Serafeim, 2013, 2020, as well as in ESG and sustainability more generally.…”
Section: Implications For Constructions Of Regulatory Mandatesmentioning
confidence: 99%