Regulatory mandates and responses to uncomfortable knowledge: The case of country-by-country reporting in the extractive sector

Baudot, Lisa; Cooper, David J.

doi:10.1016/j.aos.2021.101308

Cited by 22 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 113 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This shows that the better the understanding and implementation of regulations in the financial management of the Village Fund, the better the implementation of the accountability report on the performance of village government agencies (Riyanto, 2016). This research is in line with (Baudot & Cooper, 2021;Dura, 2016;Rabb & Muchlis, 2016). b) Regulation has a significant positive effect on the Performance Accountability of Village Government Agencies in managing village funds.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 90%

“…This shows that the better the understanding and implementation of regulations in the financial management of Village Funds, the Accountability of Performance of Village Government Agencies in managing village funds are getting better and better (Riyanto, 2016). This research is in line with (Baudot & Cooper, 2021;Dura, 2016;Rabb & Muchlis, 2016). c) The Performance Accountability System of Government Agencies has no significant effect on the Performance Accountability Report of village government agencies in managing village funds.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 90%

“…An understanding of village fund management regulations shows that the accountability of the performance of village government agencies is good (Baudot & Cooper, 2021;Salindeho et al, 2017;Agoraki et al, 2011). Regulation of the Minister of Villages for Development of Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2019 concerning Priority for the Use of Village Funds in 2020 that the Priority Program of Village Funds is the use of Village Funds as public funds compiled based on the principles of priority needs, justice, village authority, focus, participatory, self-management, and based on village resources (Frayudha, 2016;Gimon et al, 2018;Hendrawati et al, 2018;Kurrohman, 2015;Hirnissa & Zariyawati, 2017;Makalalag, et al, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regulation of the Minister of Villages for Development of Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2019 concerning Priority for the Use of Village Funds in 2020 that the Priority Program of Village Funds is the use of Village Funds as public funds compiled based on the principles of priority needs, justice, village authority, focus, participatory, self-management, and based on village resources (Frayudha, 2016;Gimon et al, 2018;Hendrawati et al, 2018;Kurrohman, 2015;Hirnissa & Zariyawati, 2017;Makalalag, et al, 2017). A better understanding of priority programs in the financial management of village funds will show a good direction in the implementation of government agency performance accountability (Baudot & Cooper, 2021;Muljo et al, 2014;Dewi Gayatri, 2019). IRJMIS ISSN: 2395-7492  Wahyuandari, W., Ratnawati, T., & Riyadi, S. (2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

effect of regulation, accountability systems, accounting principles, priority programs on performance accountability and performance reporting moderates of good financial governance of village

Wahyuandari

Ratnawati

Riyadi

2022

irjmis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research to prove, analyze and interpret the Effect of Regulation, Accountability System, Accounting Principles, Priority Programs on Performance Accountability, and Performance Reports in Village Fund Management with Moderate Variables Good Financial Governance (GFG) Village. This study uses a quantitative approach by collecting data through a survey of village heads who receive village funds. This study uses an explanatory approach by testing some hypotheses. The study population was in all villages receiving village funds in Tulungagung Regency in 2021. The number of samples was determined using the Slovin formula with a tolerance of 5% as many as 156 respondents. Sampling was done using Random Sampling, while the data analysis technique used Partial Least Square. Regulation, work accountability, accounting principles partially have a significant effect on performance Reports. Priority Programs have a significant effect on Performance AccountabilityandGFG can strengthen the relationship between the Village Fund Accounting Principles and the performance report.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

effect of regulation, accountability systems, accounting principles, priority programs on performance accountability and performance reporting moderates of good financial governance of village

Wahyuandari

Ratnawati

Riyadi

2022

irjmis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Given these high stakes, transfer pricing is marked by substantial conflict, between corporate managers inside firms (Eccles, 1985), between corporations and states (Armstrong, 1998), and between states (Rixen, 2008). Thus transfer pricing has been subject to significant scrutiny on ethical and political grounds (Armstrong, 1998;Borkowski, 2005;Hansen et al, 1992;Mehafdi, 2000;Ylönen & Teivainen, 2017), increasingly so in recent years, where transfer pricing has become the subject of unprecedented regulatory initiative (Baudot & Cooper, 2021;R. C. Christensen & Seabrooke, 2022;Rogers & Oats, 2021).…”

Section: Transfer Pricing In Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transnational Infrastructural Power of Professional Service Firms

Christensen¹

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent work has emphasized how global professional service firms exercise power over and through transnational institutions to shape economic globalization. Responding to calls for further research on these dynamics, this paper argues that global professional service firms, in particular the Big Four (Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC), exercise power in the global economy by commanding transnational infrastructures of expertise that provide stability and order to globalization, and which form a critical resource that other actors – namely corporations and regulators – depend on to act. Through a combination of qualitative interviews, participant observation and career analysis, the paper studies how global professional service firms control the transnational domain of transfer pricing. I find that such control relies on command over key expert pathways and career experiences required for recognised transfer pricing actors and practices. This power in turn enables global professional service firms to resist political and professional challenges, providing professional discretion to entrench their preferred logics of economic globalization, and ultimately determine the levels and locations of corporate taxes.

show abstract

The Spread of Sustainability Reporting in the Italian Food Manufacturing Context

Caccialanza,

Marinoni

2023

CSR, Sustainability, Ethics &Amp; Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regulatory mandates and responses to uncomfortable knowledge: The case of country-by-country reporting in the extractive sector

Cited by 22 publications

References 113 publications

effect of regulation, accountability systems, accounting principles, priority programs on performance accountability and performance reporting moderates of good financial governance of village

effect of regulation, accountability systems, accounting principles, priority programs on performance accountability and performance reporting moderates of good financial governance of village

Transnational Infrastructural Power of Professional Service Firms

The Spread of Sustainability Reporting in the Italian Food Manufacturing Context

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About