1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00384433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
1,095
4
15

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,152 publications
(1,138 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
21
1,095
4
15
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the hyphal samples in the present experiments contained 20-80 times more 16:lw5 than il5:0. Using conversion factors given by Frostegard & Baath (1996) it can be calculated from the amount of il5:0 that bacterial biomass constituted less than 1 °o of the samples. The PLFA 18: 2w6 is usually used as a signature fatty acid for fungi (Tunlid & White, 1992), and the small amount of this fatty acid compared with the other fatty acids showed that the sample content of saprophytic and other fungi was insignificant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the hyphal samples in the present experiments contained 20-80 times more 16:lw5 than il5:0. Using conversion factors given by Frostegard & Baath (1996) it can be calculated from the amount of il5:0 that bacterial biomass constituted less than 1 °o of the samples. The PLFA 18: 2w6 is usually used as a signature fatty acid for fungi (Tunlid & White, 1992), and the small amount of this fatty acid compared with the other fatty acids showed that the sample content of saprophytic and other fungi was insignificant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phospholipids were saponified and methylated to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) under N 2 at 37°C and then dissolved in hexane containing a 19:0 (methyl nonadecanoate fatty acid) FAME standard. The resulting FAMEs were analyzed with a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer ( (Sundh et al 1997;Spring et al 2000;ZechmeisterBoltenstern et al 2011); 18:1ω9c, 18:2ω6c, and 18:2ω9t for fungi (Frostegard and Bååth 1996;ZechmeisterBoltenstern et al 2011); and 10Me18:0 for Actinobacteria (Sundh et al 1997;Spring et al 2000). The PLFAs 16:1ω7c,18:1ω7t,19:1ω9t,18:1ω8t,18:1ω9t, and 18:1ω9c represent monounsaturated fatty acids, while 15:0, 16:0, 17:0, 18:0, i15:0, a13:0, a15:0, a17:0, cyc17:0, and 10Me18:0 represent saturated fatty acids.…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following PLFAs were used as markers of each of the specific groups: Bacteria: i15:0, a15:0, 15:0, i16:0, 16:1u9t, 16:1u7c, i17:0, a17:0, cy17:0, 17:0, i18:0, 18:1u9t, 18:1u7c and cy19:0; Gram-positive bacteria: i15:0, a15:0, i16:0, i17:0, a17:0, i18:0; Gram-negative bacteria: 16:1u9t, 16:1u7c, cy17:0, 18:1u9t, 18:1u7c and cy19:0; Fungi: 18:2u6,9c and 18:1u9c; Actinobacteria: 10Me17:0 and 10Me19:0; Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi: 16:1u5c. (Frostegåd and Bååth, 1996;Zelles, 1997Zelles, , 1999Zelles et al, 1997;Olsson, 1999).…”
Section: Plfa Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%