2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Penicillin Skin Testing to Assess the Prevalence of Penicillin Allergy in an Emergency Department Setting

Abstract: Penicillin skin testing is feasible in the ED setting. A substantial number of patients who self-report a penicillin allergy do not exhibit immunoglobulin E-mediated sensitization to penicillin major and minor determinants. Penicillin testing in the ED may allow the use of more appropriate antibiotics for patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although electronic health systems could do more to encourage providers to better characterize drug reactions (e.g., requiring characterization of a rash as urticarial, if known), this may be of limited utility, given that patient self-reporting of penicillin allergies has poor predictive value when assessed by subsequent skin testing. 9,10 Nonetheless, separating side effects, drug sensitivities, and allergic symptoms would likely aid medical decision making when antibiotic choices need to be made in the presence of a prior reaction, especially when clinical decision support related to medication prescribing is involved. Second, there was a substantial prevalence of providers electing to administer an alternative antibiotic rather than the indicated cephalosporin even in the face of reactions that have no immunologic basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although electronic health systems could do more to encourage providers to better characterize drug reactions (e.g., requiring characterization of a rash as urticarial, if known), this may be of limited utility, given that patient self-reporting of penicillin allergies has poor predictive value when assessed by subsequent skin testing. 9,10 Nonetheless, separating side effects, drug sensitivities, and allergic symptoms would likely aid medical decision making when antibiotic choices need to be made in the presence of a prior reaction, especially when clinical decision support related to medication prescribing is involved. Second, there was a substantial prevalence of providers electing to administer an alternative antibiotic rather than the indicated cephalosporin even in the face of reactions that have no immunologic basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Furthermore, in 93.1% of self-reported penicillin allergy, skin tests were negative. 9 With a vague history of a reaction, 85.4% of skin tests were negative. 10 Thus, avoiding cephalosporins in the face of an unproven penicillin allergy usually is unnecessary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 In our study, approximately 12% of the patients received a beta-lactam alternative antibiotic regimen, a prevalence consistent with the self-reported PCN allergy described in the literature. 20 It is important to remember that cephalosporin cross-reactivity shown in skin testing is present in only 10% of patients with a true PCN allergy. 19,21 Patients with negative results on PCN skin testing and those without a history of anaphylactic reaction to PCN can safely receive cephalosporin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Compared to beta-lactam antibiotics, these drugs are less effective in some clinical circumstances, 58 more toxic, 4,9 more costly, 10,11 and generally cover a broader antimicrobial spectrum. When a beta-lactam antibiotic is the preferred inpatient antibiotic, but not administered due to alleged allergy, patients experience more treatment failures and adverse events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%