2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10482-009-9399-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of parsimony network analysis for the formal delineation of phylogenetic species of yeasts: Candida apicola, Candida azyma, and Candida parazyma sp. nov., cosmopolitan yeasts associated with floricolous insects

Abstract: Parsimony network analysis of rDNA sequences was used to delimit phylogenetic species of yeasts in an objective, formal manner. Many strains assigned to Candida apicola (Starmerella clade), when compared to the type, fell outside the inclusion limits proposed by Kurtzman and Robnett (1998) based on a pair-wise comparison of the large subunit rRNA gene D1/D2 domains. However, when these sequences were analyzed jointly with ITS rDNA sequences by parsimony network analysis, 28 of the 30 strains formed a cohesive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis attempted a complete sampling of the described species most closely related to the type species of the genus Starmerella; the Starmerella 'sensu lato' subclade was represented only by Candida gropengiesseri and Candida magnoliae. All haplotypes of Candida apicola identified by Lachance et al (2010) were included. The root was placed on the branch leading to Candida blankii and Candida digboiensis.…”
Section: Geographical Distribution and Biology Of The Hostmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis attempted a complete sampling of the described species most closely related to the type species of the genus Starmerella; the Starmerella 'sensu lato' subclade was represented only by Candida gropengiesseri and Candida magnoliae. All haplotypes of Candida apicola identified by Lachance et al (2010) were included. The root was placed on the branch leading to Candida blankii and Candida digboiensis.…”
Section: Geographical Distribution and Biology Of The Hostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…kandeliae, Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans, Trichosporon sp., Wickerhamomyces anomalus and Zygosaccharomyces mellis. These species were identified by sequencing the D1/D2 domains of the large subunit (LSU) of the rRNA gene as described by Lachance et al (2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Unlike suggested by Lachance et al (2010Lachance et al ( , 2011b in this case gapped positions were not excluded from the analysis, because the aim was not to separate different species, but to demonstrate the intraspecies and intragenomic ITS heterogeneity (mainly indels) and the distribution of different ITS copies among the strains of the new species. In parsimony network the copy variants formed two groups, the first group consisted of copies belonging to strains NCAIM Y.02134 and NCAIM Y.02135 and one copy of NCAIM Y.02137, while the second of copies belonging to strains NCAIM Y.02136 and NCAIM Y.02137.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were observed by Kurtzman (2006) when comparing the D1/D2 and ITS sequences of S. besseyi and S. ahearnii, which had nearly identical D1/D2 sequences but were divergent in ITS sequences. Additional information on the use of the Parsimony network analysis for yeast systematic can be found in Lachance et al (2010). The name Saturnispora serradocipensis sp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%