1986
DOI: 10.1016/0305-4179(86)90010-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of Omiderm, a new skin substitute, in a burn unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 The ideal burn dressing would be nontoxic, nonantigenic, and nonadherent, have mechanical strength to maintain a barrier function, be impermeable to bacteria, allow adequate water-vapor transmission, conform to body surfaces, be permeable to oxygen and carbon dioxide, have absorptive capacity, and be compatible with topical therapeutic agents. 7 While many burn dressings are currently available, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] none are ideal. To date, silver sulfadiazine (SSD) 1% cream is the most commonly used local treatment for burns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The ideal burn dressing would be nontoxic, nonantigenic, and nonadherent, have mechanical strength to maintain a barrier function, be impermeable to bacteria, allow adequate water-vapor transmission, conform to body surfaces, be permeable to oxygen and carbon dioxide, have absorptive capacity, and be compatible with topical therapeutic agents. 7 While many burn dressings are currently available, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] none are ideal. To date, silver sulfadiazine (SSD) 1% cream is the most commonly used local treatment for burns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membrane is impermeable to biologic particles such as blood cells, other cellular debris, and high‐molecular‐weight fluids 7 . This has created problems with blood accumulation following escharectomy, 4 skin graft donor sites, 1 and, in our studies, dermabrasion. In response to these problems with extremely exudative and/or bloody acute wounds, Omikron made a meshed membrane available during early 1988.…”
Section: Omiderm—physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The membrane's high permeability rate makes it suitable for wounds that exude large amounts of liquids (especially during the primary stages of treatment), such as the following: burns; dermabrasions; split‐thickness skin graft donor sites; heavily exuding skin ulcers; and various skin diseases (toxic epidermal necrolysis, pemphigous vulgaris, epidermolysis bullosa, etc.). Even with a water permeability several times that of most other occlusive dressings, occasional cases of excess accumulation of fluids have been reported when the membrane was used for burns 4–6 . The membrane is impermeable to biologic particles such as blood cells, other cellular debris, and high‐molecular‐weight fluids 7 .…”
Section: Omiderm—physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For example, Biobrane s and Omiderm s are suitable to provoke a complete epithelisation within 2 weeks after application to superficial dermal lesions [1,3,4,10,14]. But areas of deep dermal and indeterminate depth burns will become infected regularly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Accordingly, the average ABSI was 7.9 in group A and 5.7 in group B. Nevertheless, the patient with the highest TBSA (95 %, ABSI 13) belonged to group B (Figs [1][2][3][4][5]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%