2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of non-uniform electrokinetics to enhance in situ bioremediation of phenol-contaminated soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
50
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, these observations revealed that irrespective of the applied specific voltage, pH relatively increased with increased distance from anode (conversely, pH decreased with increase of distance from cathode). Similar observations have been reported [12,30,35].It was generally observed that the moisture content decreased with time at the different applied voltage and hence sterilized distilled water was added at intervals so as maintain the moisture content at 30%.…”
Section: Effect Of Nutrient On Electro Bioremediationsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, these observations revealed that irrespective of the applied specific voltage, pH relatively increased with increased distance from anode (conversely, pH decreased with increase of distance from cathode). Similar observations have been reported [12,30,35].It was generally observed that the moisture content decreased with time at the different applied voltage and hence sterilized distilled water was added at intervals so as maintain the moisture content at 30%.…”
Section: Effect Of Nutrient On Electro Bioremediationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Seven spots, with distances of 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 and 19 cm from the (initial) anode, were sampled on each line, as shown in Figure 1. In addition, soil pH was determined using a soil-to-water ratio of 1:2.5 and water content was determined using the methods described by Luo [30]. All the analysis was performed in triplicate, and the result was calculated as the average.…”
Section: Electrokinetic Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the indigenous HOC-degrading soil bacteria ). When DC is applied to living microbial cells, various responses, such as toxic electrode effects, metabolic stimulation due to enhanced substrate mass transfer (Pribyl et al 2001), sublethal injuries (Guillou et al 2003), irreversible dielectric cell membrane breakdown (Zimmermann et al 1974), or changes in the physicochemical surface properties (Luo et al 2005) can be observed depending on the applied current, treatment time, cell type and medium characteristics (Velizarov 1999). Earlier studies using soil have shown that the application of 20 mA cm -2 DC current stimulated the activity of sulphur-oxidising bacteria (Jackman et al 1999) or the biological denitrification of nitrate-contaminated groundwater (Hayes et al 1998) due to the production of H 2 and subsequent pH changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional techniques include the use of an ion selective membrane such as cation-exchange membrane, which prevents the transport of the hydroxide ions from the cathode to the soil as shown in Figure 1 [57], continuous changing/removing of the solution in the electrode compartments [58], addition of chemical conditioning agents such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA) [59] [60], acetic acid [55], and nitric acid [61]. Innovative techniques on the other hand include a stepwise moving anode [62] [63], polarity exchange [12] [64], circulation of an electrolyte (anolyte and catholyte) solution in the electrode compartments (see Figure 2) [35] [43] [65], and the two anodes technique (TAT) (see Figure 3) which has investigated the control of the advancement of the acid and the base fronts. The soil type (mostly buffer capacity) and the presence of anions which contribute to the buffer capacity (besides carbonates, hydrocarbonates and hydroxides): borates, phosphates, silicates and organic acids anions influence the pH changes and should be taken into account when choosing the right pH-regulation technique [63].…”
Section: Ph Gradientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polarity exchange technique relies mainly on the preciseness of pH measurement during the treatment and the current intensity. The soil pH and water content of phenol-contaminated soil were controlled using the polarity reversal technique [12]. This technique can be suitable for EK bioremediation, however, continuous pH monitoring is required which is challenging and increases the overall cost of the process.…”
Section: Ph Gradientmentioning
confidence: 99%