The use of non-living animals as simulation models for cranial neurosurgical procedures: a literature review

Abstract

Simulation plays a pivotal role in neurosurgical training by allowing trainees to develop the requisite expertise to enhance patient safety. Several models have been used for simulation purposes. Non-living animal models offer a range of benefits, including affordability, availability, biological texture, and a comparable similarity to human anatomy. In this paper, we review the available literature on the use of non-living animals in neurosurgical simulation training. We aim to answer the following questions: (1) what animals have been used so far, (2) what neurosurgical approaches have been simulated, (3) what were the trainee tasks, and (4) what was the experience of the authors with these models. A search of the PubMed Medline database was performed to identify studies that examined the use of non-living animals in cranial neurosurgical simulation between 1990 and 2020. Our initial search yielded a total of 70 results. After careful screening, we included 22 articles for qualitative analysis. We compared the reports in terms of the (1) animal used, (2) type of surgery, and (3) trainee tasks. All articles were published between 2003 and 2019. These simulations were performed on three types of animals, namely sheep, cow, and swine. All authors designed specific, task-oriented approaches and concluded that the models used were adequate for replicating the surgical approaches. Simulation on non-living animal heads has recently gained popularity in the field of neurosurgical training. Non-living animal models are an increasingly attractive option for cranial neurosurgical simulation training. These models enable the acquisition and refinement of surgical skills, with the added benefits of accessibility and cost-effectiveness. To date, 16 different microneurosurgical cranial approaches have been replicated on three non-living animal models, including sheep, cows, and swine. This review summarizes the experience reported with the use of non-living animal models as alternative laboratory tools for cranial neurosurgical training, with particular attention to the set of tasks that could be performed on them.

Academic productivity of Iraqi medical students in the field of neurosurgery: A literature review

“…Table 1 shows the productivity of Iraqi medical students with their publications' number and type of authorship. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]28,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][39][40][41][42][43][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]…”

“…Mustafa Ismail [2][3][4]6,7,9,12,16,24,32,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]58,59,72] 22 9 first author\13 co-author Aktham O. Al-Khafaji [2,5,9,10,15,19,23,31,34,37,41,45,52,53,56] 15 3 first author\12 co-author Saja A. Albanaa [10,20,21,22,35,37,39,40,42,43,46] 11 1 first author\10 co-author Teeba A. Adnan [2,4,6,7,…”