2009
DOI: 10.3208/sandf.49.675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Miniature Soil Stress Measuring Cells in Laboratory Applications Involving Stress Reversals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loading calibration coefficient was determined by fitting a linear formula to the measurements in the loading test. However, the unloading curves show hysteresis similar to that reported by Zhu et al (2009) andTalesnick (2005). Zhu et al (2009) normalized the unloading data and suggested double exponential functions for the normalized data.…”
Section: Calibrations Of the Pressure Cellssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The loading calibration coefficient was determined by fitting a linear formula to the measurements in the loading test. However, the unloading curves show hysteresis similar to that reported by Zhu et al (2009) andTalesnick (2005). Zhu et al (2009) normalized the unloading data and suggested double exponential functions for the normalized data.…”
Section: Calibrations Of the Pressure Cellssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, the unloading curves show hysteresis similar to that reported by Zhu et al (2009) andTalesnick (2005). Zhu et al (2009) normalized the unloading data and suggested double exponential functions for the normalized data. For the present paper, a single exponential function was adopted to fit the normalized data to the unloading calibration tests results:…”
Section: Calibrations Of the Pressure Cellssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…4 shows a typical plan view of a single instrument layer. Zhu et al (2009) describe full details of the disc-shaped cells, which had capacities of 500 kPa to 7 MPa and diameters of 6-6 . 5 mm, and were 0 .…”
Section: Soil Stress Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements were also made of z , σ σ q ¢ ¢ and r σ ¢ at two to three levels in the sand mass at radial distances between 2 and 20R from the pile axis using miniature soil sensors. Zhu et al (2009) focus on the sensors' calibrations and performance, emphasizing the care needed to address non-linear and hysteretic cell action.…”
Section: Investigating Time-dependent Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%