2012
DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Micro- and Nanospheres as Functional Components for Bone Tissue Regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
113
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
(225 reference statements)
0
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biodegradable microspheres have been used as cell carriers with injectability, controllable biodegradability and capacity for drug incorporation [67]. Compared with hydrogel-based injectable carriers, microspheres could provide sufficient anchorages and better facilitate cell attachment for anchorage-dependent cells.…”
Section: Injectable Microspheres For Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Biodegradable microspheres have been used as cell carriers with injectability, controllable biodegradability and capacity for drug incorporation [67]. Compared with hydrogel-based injectable carriers, microspheres could provide sufficient anchorages and better facilitate cell attachment for anchorage-dependent cells.…”
Section: Injectable Microspheres For Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the combination of microspheres with cells ex vivo prior to implantation can lead to enhanced tissue regeneration. Other polymers could also be blended with poly(α-hydroxy acids) to fabricate microcarriers for cells [67,[113][114]. Other synthetic injectable platforms include polycaprolactone particles featuring cell-adhesive polydopamine for human neural stem cell attachment [115].…”
Section: Injectable Microspheres For Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 To this end, they can affect physicochemical and biological characteristics, in terms of porosity, 2 mechanical properties, 2 biodegradation, 3 the release kinetics of bioactive agents, 4 and bioactivity. 3 One of the greatest advantages of introducing MS into a bulk matrix is to allow final composite scaffolds controlled delivery of biomolecules in a spatiotemporal manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Third, a composite system of MS-embedding CPC was researched extensively to solve the major drawbacks of CPC: slow degradation rate attributed to a lack of macroporosity and poor drug-release capacity. 1 In this regard, many types of biodegradable polymeric MSs were homogeneously incorporated into bone cements, not only to facilitate in vitro/in vivo biodegradation and the resultant formation of well-interconnected macroporous structures, but also, to obtain the controlled release of bioactive agents for a prolonged period of time, without an initial drug burst. [9][10][11] In our previous studies, we developed a novel roomtemperature process of three-dimensional (3D) magnesium phosphate (MgP) scaffold fabrication, using a paste-extruding deposition (PED) system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%