The Use of Method Triangulation in Probation Research

Bauwens, Aline

doi:10.1177/206622031000200204

Cited by 21 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Method triangulation means to gather information pertaining to the same phenomenon through more than one method, primarily to determine if there is a convergence and hence, increased validity in the findings (Carugi, 2016;Kopinak, 1999). Triangulation enables examination of similarities and discrepancies in a research topic, and the assessment of socially desirable responding in sensitive and complex topics (Bauwens, 2010). In addition, it allows researchers to strive for completeness and confirmation of research findings (Yeasmin & Rahman, 2012) as weaknesses in one method can be counterbalanced by the strength in others (Carugi, 2016;Kopinak, 1999).…”

Section: Methods Triangulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Triangulation and the importance of establishing valid methods for food safety culture evaluation

Jespersen

Wallace

2017

Food Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research evaluates maturity of food safety culture in five multi-national food companies using method triangulation, specifically self-assessment scale, performance documents, and semi-structured interviews. Weaknesses associated with each individual method are known but there are few studies in food safety where a method triangulation approach is used for both data collection and data analysis. Significantly, this research shows that individual results taken in isolation can lead to wrong conclusions, resulting in potentially failing tactics and wasted investments. However, by applying method triangulation and reviewing results from a range of culture measurement tools it is possible to better direct investments and interventions. The findings add to the food safety culture paradigm beyond a single evaluation of food safety culture using generic culture surveys.

show abstract

Section: Methods Triangulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Triangulation and the importance of establishing valid methods for food safety culture evaluation

Jespersen

Wallace

2017

Food Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, criminal records were consulted to explore if self-reported offending came to the attention of the criminal justice system. Data triangulation in parole research can be of added value in unravelling inconsistencies and offering additional understanding from another data source [3].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing Risk or Supporting Desistance? A Longitudinal Study on the Nature and Perceptions of Parole Supervision in the Netherlands

Doekhie

Ginneken

Dirkzwager

et al. 2018

J Dev Life Course Criminology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Little is known about how ex-prisoners’ parole supervision experiences support or hinder the process of desistance. The aim of this article is to analyse the nature of parole supervision of Dutch (ex-)long-term prisoners in terms of official conditions, as well as the way in which parole officers (POs) and ex-prisoners navigate these conditions. The focus is particularly on the experienced supervision style and how this interacts with different dimensions of efforts at desistance. Methods Twenty-three Dutch parolees were interviewed in depth at three waves starting in prison up to one year after their release from prison. A thematic analysis was undertaken to analyse the 69 interviews. In addition, the parole files of these ex-prisoners were examined containing information about conditions, violations and sanctions. Results Parole files revealed the practice of highly engaged parole officers, who worked with parolees to strengthen factors known to foster desistance and tried to accommodate the difficulties of navigating ‘life outside’ after a relatively long prison sentence. However, the interviews showed that most parolees found their parole experience predominantly surveillance-oriented and not very helpful for desistance. Parole was experienced as most beneficial when parole officers were viewed as social workers or mentors and used their discretionary power to adjust conditions creating ‘space’ for trial-and-error. Conclusions This longitudinal study suggests that a policy culture and discourse of risk management do not necessarily preclude desistance support in parole supervision in the Netherlands, due to discretionary power of parole officers. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40865-018-0097-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

“…Even though correctional workers align with one role orientation more closely than another, in practice their behavior may not match their perceived role in every situation (Bauwens, 2010; Lynch, 1998). For example, Bauwens (2010) found differences between how POs behave when interacting with probationers and how they believe they carried out their role. In addition, Lynch (1998), in response to Feeley and Simon’s (1992) New Penology , argued that there may be a discrepancy between the organization and individual approach to roles.…”

Section: Scholarship On Correctional Workers’ Rolesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The myriad of challenges with correctional change: From goals to culture

Viglione

Rudes

Taxman

2015

European Journal of Probation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Presently, many correctional organizations seek to change both policy and practice to improve offender outcomes. The occupational roles played by both staff and management represent an imperative part of the change equation. This article provides a historical and scientific overview of the scholarship on occupational roles within correctional agencies discussing how theoretical shifts in ideology impact correctional organizations and how correctional workers think, behave and make decisions regarding the individuals they supervise. We focus on the current shift emphasizing the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs), which presents new challenges for correctional organizations. We present two case examples of EBP implementation; one aiming to shift the correctional culture and communication within a correctional facility and the second focusing on the implementation of contingency management in community corrections settings. This research highlights the challenges associated with change within correctional environments, but also provides promising findings regarding successful implementation of EBPs within correctional organizations.

show abstract

The Use of Method Triangulation in Probation Research

Cited by 21 publications

References 25 publications

Triangulation and the importance of establishing valid methods for food safety culture evaluation

Triangulation and the importance of establishing valid methods for food safety culture evaluation

Managing Risk or Supporting Desistance? A Longitudinal Study on the Nature and Perceptions of Parole Supervision in the Netherlands

The myriad of challenges with correctional change: From goals to culture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About