1996
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5877(96)01038-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of livestock-disease scoring by a primary animal-health project in Somaliland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first stage of the participatory disease appraisal involved greeting, introduction and checking that it was convenient time for pastoralists to undertake appraisal. Local translators, key informants and checklists (semi-structured questionnaires) were used to generate information on the knowledge of herders about cattle diseases and other production constraints as described in Catley and Mohammed (1996) and Catley and Admassu (2003). A total of thirty-five (35) key informant groups with group size varying from six to nine were interviewed during the study period.…”
Section: Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first stage of the participatory disease appraisal involved greeting, introduction and checking that it was convenient time for pastoralists to undertake appraisal. Local translators, key informants and checklists (semi-structured questionnaires) were used to generate information on the knowledge of herders about cattle diseases and other production constraints as described in Catley and Mohammed (1996) and Catley and Admassu (2003). A total of thirty-five (35) key informant groups with group size varying from six to nine were interviewed during the study period.…”
Section: Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, such systems should be action-orientated and result in disease control activities that are designed in partnership with livestock keepers. Given the resource and logistical constraints in pastoralist areas, pastoralists themselves are a valuable source of disease information (Catley and Mohammed 1996;Catley and Mariner 2002). Owing to its trade sensitive nature, FMD has been listed as a top agenda for several decades in this country and this study was therefore, designed to describe and analyze FMD using participatory appraisal in traditionally managed Afar pastoral herds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pile of 100 stones representing '100% benefit from cattle' were divided into different benefits in healthy cattle. Then, the benefit lost due to each disease was reduced from each benefit allocated to represent the relative reduction in benefit due to disease (Catley and Mohammed 1996;Barasa et al 2008). Proportional piling was used to gather information on livelihood means, sources of food, new disease cases and benefits derived during the past one year from cattle both with FMD and HIS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mariner and co-workers (Mariner and Paskin, 2000;Mariner and Roeder, 2003) have described methods for conducting timely participatory disease searches to document the current and historic incidence of rinderpest to serve as an intelligence base for decision-making. The Nilotic pastoral communities of southern Sudan (Schwabe and Makuet Koujok, 1981) (Catley et al, 2001) and the pastoral communities of Somali ecosystem (Catley and Mohammed, 1996;Catley et al, 2002) in the Horn of Africa are livestock specialists and excellent observers of disease incidence. Appropriate combinations of participatory disease intelligence and quantitative data form the most complete information base for strategic decision making in pastoral systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%