Personal Construct Methodology 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781119953616.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Laddering: Techniques, Applications and Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current paper reports on part of the findings from a qualitative semi-structured interview which was adapted from laddering interview techniques to explore participant construing, superordinate constructs, and strategies to engage and support non-White and White clients [ 45 ]. Interviews ranged from 45 to 90 min with the average time being 60 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current paper reports on part of the findings from a qualitative semi-structured interview which was adapted from laddering interview techniques to explore participant construing, superordinate constructs, and strategies to engage and support non-White and White clients [ 45 ]. Interviews ranged from 45 to 90 min with the average time being 60 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers must constantly be on the lookout for such things as informants making mistakes when rating the constructs, not adequately expressing the implicit construct, or providing elements that do not indicate empirical roles, observable interactions, activities, or events. Walker and Crittenden (2012, p. 80) also warn that when a session has been poorly designed, unwelcome surprises can emerge for both the informant and the researcher. Poor procedure results in going through the repertory grid process with an informant, only to find that one has little to show for their time and effort.…”
Section: Explaining the Repertory Grid Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interviews involved the following steps: 1) the participants firstly declared whether they saw themselves as successful or unsuccessful students; 2) then they were encouraged to recognize in themselves different ways of thinking about their school success, different ways in which they perceived their personal experiences of school success; 3) leading from the standpoint of polyphony, the researchers encouraged the students to perceive those various viewpoints as metaphoric voices, which could be in different mutual relationships; 4) then followed the elicitation of voices and their graphic presentation, whereby the students named the voices and wrote down short narratives which reflected the position of each one; 5) further on, the participants were encouraged to "recognize" in some of their thoughts and messages the voices of significant others, such as those of their parents, teachers, peers, and similar, and to complement their communities of selves with them; 6) finally, the participants described the relationships between the elicited voices taking into consideration the dimensions of domination versus marginalization and cooperation versus conflict. The laddering technique (Hinkle, 1965;Walker & Crittenden, 2012) was used in the interviews to map personal constructs as semantic bipolar dimensions through which the participants conceptualized opposing experiences regarding school success. The interviews lasted around one hour and audio recordings were made with the participants' approval.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%