1975
DOI: 10.1016/0020-708x(75)90159-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of “fast” neutrons and gamma radiation to sterilize the tsetse fly Glossina tachinoides Westw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, α particles are not suitable for insect sterilization due to their high linear energy transfer and weak penetrability. On the other hand, neutrons are more effective in insect sterilizing, but their radioactivity induction in irradiated materials makes them impractical for sterile insect technique (SIT) programs [13][14][15]. It should be taken into consideration that for the fitness of insects, the acceptable level of energy for SIT applications is less than 5 MeV for Gamma rays (from 60Co and 137Cs) or X-rays and less than 10 MeV for electrons [4,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Ionizing Radiation Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, α particles are not suitable for insect sterilization due to their high linear energy transfer and weak penetrability. On the other hand, neutrons are more effective in insect sterilizing, but their radioactivity induction in irradiated materials makes them impractical for sterile insect technique (SIT) programs [13][14][15]. It should be taken into consideration that for the fitness of insects, the acceptable level of energy for SIT applications is less than 5 MeV for Gamma rays (from 60Co and 137Cs) or X-rays and less than 10 MeV for electrons [4,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Ionizing Radiation Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recommended that the default dose of 400 Gy of X-ray or gamma ray was recently approved as a disinfestation treatment for stored product insects other than lepidopteran species, the lethal dose in lepidopteran species might be more than 400 Gy (FAO, 2003;Hallman, 2013), the Indian meal moth P. interpunctella is one of the most radio tolerant insect known, which need a dose more than 600 Gy of gamma ray to prevent its reproduction (Hallman, 2000(Hallman, , 2013. It was reported that the FNI was more effective in producing lethality and sterility than gamma and X-rays (Offori & Czock, 1971;Glenn & Ducoff, 1976;Robinson & Van Heemert, 1981). Regarding a high penetration of FNI, it might be more effective for using in the disinfestation treatment and SIT much more than other form of irradiations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, another form of ionizing radiation, fast neutron irradiation (FNI) is the most effective one for killing and sterilizing insects (Hallman, 2013;Snieder & Veld, 1975). Speaking, the FNI are about four times effective as compared to gamma ray in producing the same level of sterility of tsetse fly (Offori & Czock, 1971). Also, the FNI is about twice as effective as X-rays in producing lethality of Tribolium confusum (Glenn & Ducoff, 1976), in this respect, studying the effect of FNI on disinfestation of stored product pest and also to induce sterility in Lepidopteran insects is requiring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutrons produce less unspecific physiological damage in organisms at the same level of genetic effect than electrons. Unfortunately, this explanation is refuted by Offori & Czock's (1975) experiment. The essential radiation effects of the y-radiation which he applied were generated merely by (secondary) electrons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The mortality of males at the sterilising dose was higher than that observed by other authors. Van der Vloedt et al (1976) exposed the same species to fast neutrons and Offori & Czock (1975) tested the sterilising effect of 60 Co y-irradiation on G. tachinoides Westwood; at doses resulting in 100% sterility, all irradiated males were alive after 15 days. The difference between the present results and those of van der Vloedt et al could be due to radiation quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%