2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of entropy-based GRA approach to analyze and optimize the wire electrical discharge machining process for Nitronic-30

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this investigation, it was observed that ranking of impregnation materials are in descending order as A-5 > Furthermore, the ranking results of the proposed entropy-TOPSIS methodology were compared to those of other common MCDM methodologies to validate its applicability. The ranking results obtained by the entropy-TOPSIS approach were compared with VIKOR (Visekriterijumska optimizacija kompromisno resenjemeaning) [47] , ARAS (Additive ratio assessment) [48] , GRA (Grey relation analysis) [49] , PROMETHEE II (Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation II) [50] , MOORA (Multiple objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis) [51] , COPRAS (Complex proportional assessment) [52] approaches and ranking results are given in Table 8 and Figure 4. Table 8 demonstrates that the alternative A-5 highest of all other alternatives and the alternative A-1 lowest when solved with all the methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this investigation, it was observed that ranking of impregnation materials are in descending order as A-5 > Furthermore, the ranking results of the proposed entropy-TOPSIS methodology were compared to those of other common MCDM methodologies to validate its applicability. The ranking results obtained by the entropy-TOPSIS approach were compared with VIKOR (Visekriterijumska optimizacija kompromisno resenjemeaning) [47] , ARAS (Additive ratio assessment) [48] , GRA (Grey relation analysis) [49] , PROMETHEE II (Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation II) [50] , MOORA (Multiple objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis) [51] , COPRAS (Complex proportional assessment) [52] approaches and ranking results are given in Table 8 and Figure 4. Table 8 demonstrates that the alternative A-5 highest of all other alternatives and the alternative A-1 lowest when solved with all the methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%