2016
DOI: 10.1177/0305735615613846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of emotionally arousing music to enhance memory for subsequently presented images

Abstract: Emotion-enhanced memory occurs when an arousal response to an emotion stimulus strengthens memory consolidation. We tested whether listening to emotionally arousing music enhanced memory in this way. In a within-subjects design, 37 participants (18 to 50 years, 22 female) listened to two of their own highly enjoyed music tracks, two self-rated neutral tracks from other participants’ selections, and a five-minute radio interview. After each listening episode, participants memorised a unique array of 24 images. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another pattern that can be found in the literature concerns the moderating role of musical preference -the extent to which listeners enjoy the music style that is used as background or prime -in boosting the positive effects of music. Preference does not seem to change the Irrelevant Sound Effect (Perham and Vizard, 2011), but -at least in younger adults -it boosts the positive effects of background music on reading comprehension (Mcdonald, 2013), as well as those of musical primes on image encoding (Carr and Rickard, 2016): in both cases, preferred music outperforms silence, while non-preferred music does not. One explanation for the advantage of preferred music is that it is rewarding (Blood and Zatorre, 2001;Ferreri and Verga, 2016), and reward may be one mechanism subtending the positive effects of music on cognition (Ferreri and Verga, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another pattern that can be found in the literature concerns the moderating role of musical preference -the extent to which listeners enjoy the music style that is used as background or prime -in boosting the positive effects of music. Preference does not seem to change the Irrelevant Sound Effect (Perham and Vizard, 2011), but -at least in younger adults -it boosts the positive effects of background music on reading comprehension (Mcdonald, 2013), as well as those of musical primes on image encoding (Carr and Rickard, 2016): in both cases, preferred music outperforms silence, while non-preferred music does not. One explanation for the advantage of preferred music is that it is rewarding (Blood and Zatorre, 2001;Ferreri and Verga, 2016), and reward may be one mechanism subtending the positive effects of music on cognition (Ferreri and Verga, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Based on the idea that non-task-concurrent music (prime) could keep the benefits of background music (arousal, reward or mood improvement) while minimizing its distraction-related costs, we predicted that music would have strong advantage over silence and/or environmental sounds. Concerning preference, we predicted an advantage of preferred over non-preferred music, based on previous findings (Mcdonald, 2013;Carr and Rickard, 2016) as well as on the principle that preference could maximize the reward component of music.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Listening to music did not enhance performance for either group. Researching a wider age range, Carr and Rickard (2016) tested whether listening to emotionally arousing music enhanced memory in 37 participants aged eighteen to fifty years, who listened to two of their own highly enjoyed music tracks, two self rated neutral tracks from other participants' selections, and a five minute radio interview. After each listening episode, participants memorised a unique array of 24 images.…”
Section: Preprintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While less relevant to this review, it is worth mentioning a small set of studies that have used MECs as an independent variable, leading to findings that MECs led to improved communication and heightened self-perception in a music therapy context (Lee, 2008), as also hypothesised by Tihanyi (2016), had no effect on memory performance as measured by image recall (Carr & Rickard, 2016) or on craving reduction in abstinent individuals with alcohol use disorder (Mathis & Han, 2017), had an effect on gait, as seen by increased cadence and stride length, and reduced stride time (Park et al, 2019), did not improve mood or increase generosity, helpfulness, or prosocial behaviour (Konečni et al, 2007), but contradictorily, did promote altruistic behaviour (Fukui & Toyoshima, 2014). Three devices have also been designed in an attempt to induce chills, through electrostatic force (Fukushima & Kajimoto, 2012) or coldness (Ishikawa et al, 2019;, with the purpose of enhancing emotional experiences.…”
Section: Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benedek and Kaernbach (2011),Grewe et al (2009a),Mori and Iwanaga (2017) No effect: Baltes , et al (2011),Carr and Rickard (2016),Jaimovich et al (2013),Schäfer and Sedlmeier (2011) Skin conductance responseIncrease:Bannister and Eerola (2018), Kaernbach (2011), Craig (2005),Egermann et al (2011),Grewe et al (2007),Grewe et al (2009a),Grewe et al (2011),Guhn et al (2007),Klepzig et al (2020),Mas-Herrero et al (2014),Mori and Iwanaga (2014b),Mori and Iwanaga (2015),Mori and Iwanaga (2017), Polo (2017), Rickard (2004), Sachs et al (2016), Salimpoor et al (2009), Salimpoor et al (2011) Effect (direction not specified): Grewe et al (2007) No effect: Blood and Zatorre (2001), Carr and Rickard (2016), Jaimovich et al (2013) Peripheral skin temperature Decrease: Salimpoor et al (2009), Salimpoor et al (2011) No effect: Blood and Zatorre (2001), Craig (2005), Rickard (2004) Heart Heart rate Increase: Benedek and Kaernbach (2011), Blood and Zatorre (2001), Grewe et al (2009a), Guhn et al (2007), Mas-Herrero et al (2014), Polo (2017), Sachs et al (2016), Salimpoor et al (2009), Salimpoor et al (2011), Sumpf et al (2015) No effect: Baltes , et al (2011), Carr and Rickard (2016), Grewe et al (2011), Jaimovich et al (2013), Mori and Iwanaga (2017), Rickard (2004), Schäfer and Sedlmeier (2011) Blood volume pulse amplitude Decrease: Benedek and Kaernbach (2011), Salimpoor et al (2009), Salimpoor et al (2011) Lesser-used measures See Subsection 3.4.2 Other Respiration rate Increase: Baltes , et al (2011), Salimpoor et al (2009), Salimpoor et al (2011) No effect: Benedek and Kaernbach (2011), Grewe et al (2011), Mori and Iwanaga (2017), Sumpf et al (2015) Respiration depth Increase: Benedek and Kaernbach (2011), Blood and Zatorre (2001), Grewe et al (2009a) No effect: Mori and Iwanaga (2017) Muscle tension Increase: Blood and Zatorre (2001) No effect: Rickard (2004) Salivary cortisol Decrease: Fukui and Toyoshima (2013) No effect: Rickard (2004) Lesser-used measures See Subsection 3.4.3…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%