The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of electrodermal activity (EDA) measurement to understand consumer emotions – A literature review and a call for action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(275 reference statements)
1
76
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrode adhesiveness with the skin can decline because of oil and perspiration [ 38 ] that might vary during the day. Intermittent physical disconnection between electrodes and the skin leads to a sudden drop and rise in EDA signal [ 39 , 40 ]. Kleckner and colleagues suggested that abrupt drops below 0.05 S, which is the generally accepted minimal amplitude criterion of SCR [ 25 ], are likely caused by signal loss due to the electrode detachment when recording from wrist-worn dry-electrode EDA sensor and should be discarded from the analysis [ 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Electrode adhesiveness with the skin can decline because of oil and perspiration [ 38 ] that might vary during the day. Intermittent physical disconnection between electrodes and the skin leads to a sudden drop and rise in EDA signal [ 39 , 40 ]. Kleckner and colleagues suggested that abrupt drops below 0.05 S, which is the generally accepted minimal amplitude criterion of SCR [ 25 ], are likely caused by signal loss due to the electrode detachment when recording from wrist-worn dry-electrode EDA sensor and should be discarded from the analysis [ 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantization noise in wearable EDA had been previously reported [ 50 , 51 , 52 ] but gained little attention. A possible solution to deal with this would be to remove all high-frequency noise by using a moving average or by applying a low-pass filter on the EDA signal, as has been recommended in earlier works [ 32 , 40 ], before extracting SCRs using Ledalab. However, there is no consensus on the smoothing parameter (window size), filter type (finite impulse response (FIR)/infinite impulse response), order (2nd- to 32nd-order), and cutoff frequency (0.4–3 Hz) [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the reporting of neuro-studies' procedures, design, and data analysis needs to be as complete and transparent as possible. Researchers need to include detailed information on missing data, data cleaning or filtering, thinkable confounding variables, software and hardware used, and baseline measures, allowing other researchers replicate the study and to assess the validity of the data and interpretations (e.g., Caruelle et al, 2019;Lim, 2018;Stanton et al, 2017). This transparency is particularly necessary as different hardware (i.e., tools), software, and data processing may produce different results (e.g., Caruelle et al, 2019;Kennedy and Northover, 2016).…”
Section: Data-analysis and Interpretation Neuro-data Creates New Chamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prevalent neurophysiological tools are galvanic skin response (GSR), cardiovascular measures, electromyography (EMG), and eye tracking (Harris et al, 2018;Mauss and Robinson, 2009;Poels and Dewitte, 2006). GSR captures activity in the sweat glands, which indicates physiological arousal and is measured by electrodes or sensors placed on the skin (Caruelle et al, 2019;Christopoulos et al, 2019;Ohme et al, 2009). GSR is suitable to, amongst other things, investigate attentional and emotional processes (Dawson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the EDA signal is studied in several papers, [26,42,49,53,55,57,58]. A complete study about the EDA signal is shown in [41,59].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%