2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of discrete computer simulation modeling to estimate return on leadership development investment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A lack of empirical evidence of the relationship between LDPs and organizational effectiveness is apparent in prior research (Richard et al, 2014); and while this study was an exploration it still adds value to expanding the existing knowledge of LDP impacts on organizational level outcomes. Organizational leaders are vital drivers of strategy and can use the findings from this study to support the investment of LDPs not only for individual employee development but also in support of the overall organization.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lack of empirical evidence of the relationship between LDPs and organizational effectiveness is apparent in prior research (Richard et al, 2014); and while this study was an exploration it still adds value to expanding the existing knowledge of LDP impacts on organizational level outcomes. Organizational leaders are vital drivers of strategy and can use the findings from this study to support the investment of LDPs not only for individual employee development but also in support of the overall organization.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimal research exists that examines the contribution of leadership development to organizational effectiveness while much is researched on the outcomes of leadership development for individuals. The outcomes for the organization, as a result of leadership development, centered around organizational effectiveness remains largely unexplored (Richard, et al , 2014; Day et al , 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baldwin & Ford, 1988;Blume et al, 2010;Goldstein & Ford, 2002;Hutchins et al, 2010) and evaluating leadership development initiatives (e.g. Avolio et al, 2010;Militello & Benham, 2010;Richard et al, 2014) offers promising advances to the fields. By exploring what the leadership knowing-doing gap experience is like for leaders and how incidents of the gap may stand in the way of leadership action, this study further emphasizes the need for follow up on leadership development (Day, 2000;Day et al, 2014) particularly in terms of examining how it translates into real practice in organizations.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the rising interest in leadership development (Day, 2000;Day, Fleenor, Atwater, Sturm, & McKee, 2014), building knowledge about leadership often remains an end in itself, with comparably little attention paid to how managers experience transferring their leadership learning into leadership action in organizations (Blanchard, Meyer, & Ruhe, 2007;Blume, Ford, Baldwin, & Huang, 2010;Pfeffer & Sutton, 2000). This may be aided by a general lack of follow-up to determine the effectiveness of leadership development for the desired positive impacts on the attitudes, behaviors and performance of managers (Avolio, Avey, & Quisenberry, 2010;Collins & Holton, 2004) and the return on leadership development investment in organizations (Avolio et al, 2010;Richard, Holton Iii, & Katsioloudes, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation