2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-66902014000200012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of different clustering methods in the evaluation of genetic diversity in upland cotton

Abstract: -The continuous development and evaluation of new genotypes through crop breeding is essential in order to obtain new cultivars. The objective of this work was to evaluate the genetic divergences between cultivars of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using the agronomic and technological characteristics of the fibre, in order to select superior parent plants. The experiment was set up during 2010 at the Federal University of Ceará in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. Eleven cultivars of upland cotton were used in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic diversity among the cotton genotypes in this study ranged from 68.64 to 1121.27 (Table 7). This amplitude echoes that of Araújo et al (2014) who found distances of 23.01 to 1172.28 while evaluating the fiber quality and productivity of 11 cultivars resulting only from Embrapa's breeding program. These results indicate the limited genetic base of current cultivars.…”
Section: Genetic Divergencesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Genetic diversity among the cotton genotypes in this study ranged from 68.64 to 1121.27 (Table 7). This amplitude echoes that of Araújo et al (2014) who found distances of 23.01 to 1172.28 while evaluating the fiber quality and productivity of 11 cultivars resulting only from Embrapa's breeding program. These results indicate the limited genetic base of current cultivars.…”
Section: Genetic Divergencesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…For analysis of genetic divergence, the genetic distance between the different pairs of genotypes was calculated, employing the generalized Mahalanobis distance as a measure of genetic dissimilarity among the cultivars (Mahalanobis 1936). To estimate this distance, the averages were computed for each of the variables for each cultivar, and then the residual covariance matrix was established, the data transformation matrix, the variance of transformed variables, the averages of uncorrelated variables, and finally the pivotal condensation technique for resolving the dispersion matrix (Araújo et al 2014). From the dissimilarity matrix a cluster analysis was performed using the hierarchical methods of single linkage (nearest neighbor), of Ward, of complete linkage (furthest neighbor), of the median, the average linkage within a cluster and the average linkage between clusters, allowing dendrogram to be produced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the dissimilarity matrix a cluster analysis was performed using the hierarchical methods of single linkage (nearest neighbor), of Ward, of complete linkage (furthest neighbor), of the median, the average linkage within a cluster and the average linkage between clusters, allowing dendrogram to be produced. To validate clusters, that is, to verify the ability of the dendrogram to reproduce the dissimilarity matrix (Araújo et al 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to the number of groups formed it was possible to find that the Euclidean distance showed a greater capacity of differentiation in a group in comparison to the Mahalanobis distance. Araújo et al (2014) comparing the hierarchical methods with 11 cotton cultivars obtained that the nearest neighbor, the furthest neighbor, UPGMA and Ward grouping method also resulted in 90% or more of similarity among the grouped genotypes.…”
Section: Picture D Dendrogram Of 15 Soybean Genotypes By the Completmentioning
confidence: 99%