The use of complementary and alternative medical providers by insured cancer patients in Washington state

Abstract

BACKGROUND Insurance coverage of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is expanding. However, to the authors' knowledge, little is know concerning CAM utilization among cancer patients under the insurance model of financing. In this study, the authors evaluated CAM provider utilization by cancer patients in a state that requires the inclusion of alternative practitioners in private, commercial insurance products. METHODS An analysis was carried out of year 2000 claims data from two large Washington State insurance companies. RESULTS Of 357,709 claimants, 7915 claimants (2.3%) had a cancer diagnosis. Among cancer patients, 7.1% had a claim for naturopathy, acupuncture, or massage; and 11.6% had a claim for chiropractic during the study year. The use of naturopathy (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; P < 0.001) and acupuncture (OR, 1.4; P < 0.001) were more common, and the use of chiropractic was less common (OR, 0.9; P < 0.001) for cancer patients compared with those without cancer. No significant differences were noted in the use of massage between the two groups. Except in 2 individuals (0.03%), cancer patients also had at least 1 conventional provider claim during the year. Factors associated with nonchiropractic alternative provider use were female gender, the presence of metastatic cancer, hematologic malignancy, and the use of chemotherapy. Increased use of naturopathic physicians accounted for much of this trend. Musculoskeletal pain was the most common diagnosis at the CAM provider visit. Billed amounts for alternative services were < 2% of the overall medical bills for cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS A substantial number of insured cancer patients will use alternative providers if they are given the choice. The cost of this treatment is modest compared with conventional care charges. For individuals with cancer, CAM providers do not appear to be replacing conventional providers but instead are integrated into overall care. Cancer 2004;100:1522–30. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

Complementary medicine use by men with prostate cancer: a systematic review of prevalence studies

“…22,24,28,29,34,36,37,39,40,50,51,54,56,[58][59][60]62 The remaining studies collected data from broader study populations and reported the prevalence of CAM use for subgroups including men with prostate cancer. 23,[25][26][27][30][31][32][33]35,38,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]52,53,55,57,61,63 The characteristics of all 42 included studies are summarised in Table 2 …”

Complementary and Alternative Medicine During Cancer Treatment: Beyond Innocence

“…Because surveys vary in terms of definitions of CAM and of specific types of therapy included in questionnaires, the assessment of overall prevalence is somewhat complicated. Noninvasive therapies like acupuncture, chiropractic, massage, spiritual healing, meditation, and imagery are most common, but use of dietary supplements is rapidly gaining terrain [4][5][6][7][8]. As a result, the economic impact of CAM is enormous.…”

“…Although only a small percentage of overall costs are claimed, insurance coverage of CAM is also further expanding [6].…”

Acupuncture: Role in Comprehensive Cancer Care—A Primer for the Oncologist and Review of the Literature

“…For example, Washington State has adopted the Every Category of Provider (ECOP) law. 92 The ECOP law states that every category of licensed provider should be included in private health insurance if their scope of practice encompasses medical conditions that the policy covers. Acupuncturists are licensed providers in Washington State.…”