2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-011-2767-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of COI barcodes for molecular identification of forensically important fly species in Germany

Abstract: Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-based insect identification has become a routine and accurate tool in forensic entomology. In the present study, we demonstrate the utility of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase I gene "barcoding region" as a universal marker for molecular identification of forensically important Diptera. We analyzed 111 specimens belonging to 13 species originating from Frankfurt am Main, Germany (Calliphoridae: Calliphora vicina, Calliphora vomitoria, Lucilia ampullacea, Lucilia caesar, Luci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sin embargo algunos estudios sugieren que a pesar de que la región COI es sin duda de gran utilidad para la identificación de especies de importancia forense, no todas las especies se pueden identificar adecuadamente con este marcador (Wells y Williams, 2007;Harvey et al, 2008;Boehme et al, 2012). Por esta razón, otros genes (o fragmentos de genes), como la región ITS2, también han sido postulados como buenos marcadores (Nelson et al, 2008;.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Sin embargo algunos estudios sugieren que a pesar de que la región COI es sin duda de gran utilidad para la identificación de especies de importancia forense, no todas las especies se pueden identificar adecuadamente con este marcador (Wells y Williams, 2007;Harvey et al, 2008;Boehme et al, 2012). Por esta razón, otros genes (o fragmentos de genes), como la región ITS2, también han sido postulados como buenos marcadores (Nelson et al, 2008;.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Currently, molecular phylogenetic work based on a COI sequence gene has been extensively used (Jamnongluk et al 2003;Nakahara & Muraji 2008;Zhang et al 2010;Liu et al 2011) because of the high degree of nucleotide variation (Boehme et al 2011). Moreover, this sequence has been standardised for molecular identification in all animal species (Hebert et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They are now both found in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, large parts of Asia, Europe and North America (Waterhouse and Paramonov 1950, Rognes 1980, 1994, Norris 1990, Bishop 1991, 1995, Holloway 1991, Fischer 2000, Harvey et al 2003a, 2003b, 2008, Chen et al 2004, Heath and Bishop 2006, Park et al 2009, Liu et al 2011, Boehme et al 2012, GilArriortua et al 2013). They have each received intensive biological investigation, and it would benefit comparative studies if it could be confirmed that they are actually sister species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest genus in the subfamily, Lucilia has received few quantitative phylogenetic studies (Aubertin 1933, Stevens and Wall 1996, 1997, Wells et al 2007, Park et al 2009, DeBry et al 2012, Sonet et al 2012), with research generally focusing on species of medical, veterinary or forensic interest in specific geographic regions (Stevens and Wall 2001, Chen et al 2004, Wallman et al 2005, Harvey et al 2008, Reibe et al 2009, Liu et al 2011, Boehme et al 2012, DeBry et al 2012, Nelson et al 2012, Sonet et al 2013). The most comprehensive revision of the genus was published by Aubertin (1933), who recognised 27 species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%