2015
DOI: 10.1080/00305316.2015.1081421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular clock analysis on fiveBactroceraspecies flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on combination ofCOIandNADHsequences

Abstract: This paper marks the first attempt at using the molecular clock analysis on five Malaysian Bactrocera species based on combined data of COI and ND1 to test the divergence times of species that infested 11 varieties of fruits and vegetables. A divergence tree was constructed to estimate the cryptic species among the five closely related Bactrocera species viz. B. (Bactrocera) and B. (Zeugodacus). Both subgenera evolved and diverged approximately 21.5933 million years ago (MYA). The particularly complex taxonomi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, factors other than clock parameters can affect evolutionary rates. Published estimates of when C. capitata last shared a common ancestor with Bactrocera include 24.9 MYA (Yaakop et al, ; no confidence intervals reported), 83 MYA (95% HPD: 64–103 MYA; Nardi et al, ) and 110.9 MYA [95% confidence interval (CI): 131.4–91.2 MYA] (Krosch et al, ). Our Bayesian phylogeny estimate of 31.21 MYA (95% CI: 41.27–21.16) is earlier than many others due to root prior calibration using the Rhagoletis–Drosophila split estimated by Misof et al (), as opposed to calibration using maximum fossil ages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, factors other than clock parameters can affect evolutionary rates. Published estimates of when C. capitata last shared a common ancestor with Bactrocera include 24.9 MYA (Yaakop et al, ; no confidence intervals reported), 83 MYA (95% HPD: 64–103 MYA; Nardi et al, ) and 110.9 MYA [95% confidence interval (CI): 131.4–91.2 MYA] (Krosch et al, ). Our Bayesian phylogeny estimate of 31.21 MYA (95% CI: 41.27–21.16) is earlier than many others due to root prior calibration using the Rhagoletis–Drosophila split estimated by Misof et al (), as opposed to calibration using maximum fossil ages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Yaakop et al . ), as the distantly related (tribe, supergenus) C . capitata did not separate well from B .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study further demonstrates that, in spite of the significant overlap, tephritid antennal responses were also divergent. Interestingly, this did not follow relatedness Yaakop et al 2015), as the distantly related (tribe, supergenus) C. capitata did not separate well from B. dorsalis and B. zonata (Fig. S10), whereas Z. cucurbitae's olfactory responses (same subgenus as B. dorsalis and B. zonata) were the most distant of the four.…”
Section: Sharedness Phylogenetic Relatedness and Pre-adaptive Bridgementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results also revealed that the split between Zeugodacus+Bactrocera and C. capitata occurred less than 20 million years ago. Previously published works proposed that C. capitata and Bactrocera diverged around 24.9 mya (no confidence intervals reported, (Yaakop et al, 2015)), 83 mya (95% height posterior density: 64-103 mya; (Nardi et al, 2010)), 110.9 mya (95% confidence interval: 91.2-131.4 mya; (Krosch et al, 2012)). The difference in the estimates could be due to several factors such as the type of molecular markers (nuclear or mitochondrial), and to the choice of priors: the clock and demographic model, the calibration points, the calibrating mutation rate, and the number of generations per year assumed.…”
Section: Dating Analysis Suggests Fast and Recent Radiation In Bactroceramentioning
confidence: 94%