Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-5182-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Case Studies in R&D Impact Evaluations

Abstract: The use of case study methods in evaluating R&D impacts poses a paradox. On the one hand, most of the major methodological advances in R&D evaluation are attributed to the areas ofpeer review, interview and questionnaire techniques, and quantitative methods such as econometrics, bibliometrics, and technology indicators, while case study is characterized as an old technique that has had no recent developments (Luukkonen-Gronow, 1987). On the other hand, many R&D impact evaluations qualify as case study research… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They can clearly identify qualitative issues, such as degree of collaboration, training for junior researchers, and the dynamics within a specific setting that can be used to judge success. Traditionally, case studies have been used to gauge the linkages between R&D and economic innovation and to judge whether R&D projects meet policy objectives established for a group mandated to address linkages between R&D and the economy (Kingsley, 1993). A commonly cited justification for using case studies as a research method in general is due to a lack of clearly understood theory to associate with results.…”
Section: Bibliometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can clearly identify qualitative issues, such as degree of collaboration, training for junior researchers, and the dynamics within a specific setting that can be used to judge success. Traditionally, case studies have been used to gauge the linkages between R&D and economic innovation and to judge whether R&D projects meet policy objectives established for a group mandated to address linkages between R&D and the economy (Kingsley, 1993). A commonly cited justification for using case studies as a research method in general is due to a lack of clearly understood theory to associate with results.…”
Section: Bibliometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pueden mencionarse finalmente los que aportan una aproximación a las características de los afectados, así como a las múltiples consecuencias provocadas en su situación personal y familiar, mediante la realización de encuestas o entrevistas con un ámbito territorial y temporal diverso (Valiño, 2013;Arredondo y Palma, 2013). Pese a lo limitado de la investigación realizada hasta el momento en esta última línea, la convergencia en algunas de sus conclusiones con estudios publicados en otro país con gran volumen de desahucios como Estados Unidos (Kingsley, Smith y Price, 2009;Axel-Lute, 2009;Been y Gould, 2012) aporta cierta capacidad de generalización a esos resultados.…”
Section: Ricardo Méndez Gutiérrez Del Valle Y Julio Plaza Tabascounclassified
“…Case studies focus on the institutional, organizational, and technical factors that influence research processes, and provide in-depth insights into the success or failure of a research project. Traditionally, case studies have been used to gauge the linkages between R&D and economic innovation and to judge whether R&D projects meet policy objectives established for a group mandated to address linkages between R&D and the economy (Kingsley, 1993). Yin (1984) summarized the strengths of case studies as addressing why and how an event occurs, providing a rich set of information on nonquantifiable relationships that exist among variables included in a study, and exploring topics unhindered by constraining theory.…”
Section: Bibliometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case study approach has been used to evaluate U.S. Department of Defense research since the 1960s (see Kingsley, 1993). However, qualitative assessments are not common in R&D evaluation among other federal programs.…”
Section: Qualitative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation