2010
DOI: 10.2202/1548-923x.2049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Audience Response Systems in Nursing Education: Best Practice Guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential disadvantages may occur where there are students without their own mobile devices, if there are problems with network connections, or there is limited access to online ARS via wireless networks. The possibility of technology failure may potentially cause instructor anxiety (Mareno, Bremner, & Emerson, 2010). Noel, Stover and McNutt (2015) noted an increase in the number of studies that have examined the use of mobile devices for 'polling' in educational settings.…”
Section: Audience Response Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Potential disadvantages may occur where there are students without their own mobile devices, if there are problems with network connections, or there is limited access to online ARS via wireless networks. The possibility of technology failure may potentially cause instructor anxiety (Mareno, Bremner, & Emerson, 2010). Noel, Stover and McNutt (2015) noted an increase in the number of studies that have examined the use of mobile devices for 'polling' in educational settings.…”
Section: Audience Response Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the most part, lecturers found ARS relatively easy to use, with the main challenges being the development of suitable questions (Jain & Farley, 2012). However, it can take some time to learn to use the new technology (Mareno et al, 2010). Nielsen et al (2013) found that lecturers with prior experience of ARS were rated higher by students.…”
Section: Audience Response Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on surveys of students, clicker use in the classroom offers several advantages. Clickers can make class more enjoyable (Ghosh & Renna, 2009;Taneja, 2009), increase student engagement and motivation (Ghosh & Renna, 2009;Bojinova & Oigara, 2013;Eastman, Iyer, & Eastman, 2011;Taneja, 2009), and create a positive learning environment (Kay & LeSage, 2009;Mareno, Bremner & Emerson, 2010). Clickers have been shown to improve college English listening and speaking skills (Yu, Chen, Kong, Sun, & Zheng, 2014) and student attitudes toward technology (Eastman, Iyer, & Eastman, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study concluded that the use of clickers does not result in higher grades (Llorens et al, 2014). Technology-based problems (e.g., clickers or software not working) and increased costs to students are also cited in the literature (Mareno et al, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples are: voting for decision making, finding characteristics of an audience, market research, etc. In the last decade PRS are used in teaching and training to increase participation, engagement and learning (See for example, Beatty & Gerace, 2009;Mareno, Bremner, & Emerson, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%