2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation with on-line detection in the study of drug retention within liposomal nanocarriers and drug transfer kinetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct determination of the encapsulated drug is more accurate, but not always feasible. In many cases, the role of AF4 is limited to the separation of the carrier from the free drug, while the quantification is performed offline with a complementary technique such as HPLC [128][129][130][131][132]. Albeit of most general applicability, this approach is dispersive and time-consuming because of such issues as the need for preconcentrating the fractions and possible sample loss.…”
Section: Choice Of the Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Direct determination of the encapsulated drug is more accurate, but not always feasible. In many cases, the role of AF4 is limited to the separation of the carrier from the free drug, while the quantification is performed offline with a complementary technique such as HPLC [128][129][130][131][132]. Albeit of most general applicability, this approach is dispersive and time-consuming because of such issues as the need for preconcentrating the fractions and possible sample loss.…”
Section: Choice Of the Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drugs with strong chromophores, such as those used in photodynamic therapy, can be easily detected by UV absorption spectroscopy (UV/Vis) or fluorescence detection (FLD), even when encapsulated inside the nanocarriers [129,131,132]. The interference due to the anisotropic scattering could be a serious issue and should be evaluated by running samples of blank nanocarriers [133].…”
Section: Choice Of the Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the characterization of polymersome scaffold and size has been carried out by different analytical tools (small angle neutron or X‐ray scattering, cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo TEM), static and dynamic light scattering (DLS)) . However, access to full information on the loaded polymersomes, including membrane composition and density of polymersomes, is thoroughly facilitated by multiple‐detector asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation (AF4) but so far not fully exploited to investigate liposomes and polymersomes . Most reports focused only on their size distribution or encapsulation efficiency .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Hu et al evaluated the drug distribution across different NP size fractions by collecting AF4 fractions followed by offline HPLC analysis [36]. Hinna et al and Fraunhofer et al investigated the feasibility of coupling AF4 with online UV-Vis analysis to directly probe loading or transfer between liposomal and gelatin NPs, respectively [37][38][39][40]. However, a major limitation of UV-Vis detection is the interference from particle scattering [37,41], which restricts measurements to only NPs with high analyte entrapment and can make quantification infeasible for larger NPs (with high scattering intensities) with low drug loading [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both detectors show that the high burst release of enrofloxacin is indeed eliminated in AF4, while the NPs and entrapped drug are retained in the channel for analysis. Although prior AF4 methods have utilized UV-Vis detection for entrapped drug quantification[37][38][39][40]52], here UV-Vis was not suitable to quantify enrofloxacin in the PLGA-Enro NPs because the UV absorbance attributable to the drug was low relative to the particle scattering (SI,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%