2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0142716405050332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of articles by monolingual Puerto Rican Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment

Abstract: The present investigation sought to evaluate patterns of article use in a group of monolingual Spanishspeaking children with specific language impairment (SLI). In particular, because of conflicting results reported in previous studies, it was of interest to discern specific types of nontarget responses and how these corresponded to what has been reported in other Spanish-speaking children with SLI. Eleven children with SLI and 11 age-matched peers participated in the study. Three different spontaneous speech … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
38
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(44 reference statements)
10
38
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Our assumption is that where a child does not use an overt subject, they have chosen to instead use a null subject pronoun, which is a definite. As we have claimed above, this is of theoretical interest inasmuch as children with SLI have been shown to struggle with definites, including definite articles (Restrepo and Gutiérrez-Clellen 2001;Anderson and Souto 2005), direct object clitics (Merino 1983;De la Mora 2004) and verb tense (Grinstead et al 2013). While the ways in which discourse-pragmatic considerations predict the expression of an overt subject in particular dialects is very interesting, 6 they were not the focus of our inquiry.…”
Section: Subject Occurrence Codingmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our assumption is that where a child does not use an overt subject, they have chosen to instead use a null subject pronoun, which is a definite. As we have claimed above, this is of theoretical interest inasmuch as children with SLI have been shown to struggle with definites, including definite articles (Restrepo and Gutiérrez-Clellen 2001;Anderson and Souto 2005), direct object clitics (Merino 1983;De la Mora 2004) and verb tense (Grinstead et al 2013). While the ways in which discourse-pragmatic considerations predict the expression of an overt subject in particular dialects is very interesting, 6 they were not the focus of our inquiry.…”
Section: Subject Occurrence Codingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…4 In the domain of language disorders, Grinstead et al (2013) claim that this failure to communicate between syntax and discourse-pragmatics is responsible not only for the prolonged delay in tense marking in children with SLI, reported by Rice and Wexler (1996) among others, but also for the more general pattern of all discourse-sensitive constructions being slow to develop in the language of children with SLI, while discourse-insensitive constructions are acquired with relatively little difficulty. Specifically, they review evidence that discourse-sensitive constructions including definite articles (e.g., Anderson and Souto 2005), direct object clitics (e.g., De la Mora et al 2003) and verb tense (Grinstead et al 2013) are problematic for child Spanish-speakers, diagnosed with SLI, while discourse-insensitive constructions, such as nominal plural marking and noun-adjective agreement (Grinstead et al 2008), are not problematic. This special difficulty in the development of discourse-sensitive constructions for children with SLI is referred to as Interface Deficit.…”
Section: Subject Occurrence In Child Spanish and Catalanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the small sample size, it is important to note that the strict diagnosis criteria of SLI often make it difficult to use big samples, thus, many studies of children with this disorder have a limited number of participants (e.g., Acosta, Moreno, & Axpe, 2012;Anderson & Souto, 2005;Contemori & Garraffa, 2010;Domsch et al, 2012;Marinellie, 2004).…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En algunos casos, los niños son monolingües 6,7,8,9 mientras que en otros son bilingües 10,11,12 . Las características del contexto sociolingüístico donde viven los hispanohablantes también varían, lo mismo que la edad de los individuos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Las características del contexto sociolingüístico donde viven los hispanohablantes también varían, lo mismo que la edad de los individuos. Algunos investigadores trabajan con niños menores de 4 años 11 y la mayoría lo hace con niños cuyas edades abarcan entre los 3;11 y 5;9 años 6,7,8,9 , aunque otros lo han hecho con mayores de 7 años 10,12 . Así mismo, algunos estudios utilizan muestras espontáneas, mientras que otros emplean tareas experimentales, o bien, se les solicita a los niños contar o recontar un cuento.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified