. Development of models to predict anabolic response to testosterone administration in healthy young men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284: E1009-E1017, 2003. First published January 7, 2003 10.1152/ajpendo.00536.2002.-Considerable heterogeneity exists in the anabolic response to androgen administration; however, the factors that contribute to variation in an individual's anabolic response to androgens remain unknown. We investigated whether testosterone dose and/or any combination of baseline variables, including concentrations of hormones, age, body composition, muscle function, and morphometry or polymorphisms in androgen receptor could explain the variability in anabolic response to testosterone. Fifty-four young men were treated with a long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and one of five doses (25, 50, 125, 300, or 600 mg/wk) of testosterone enanthate (TE) for 20 wk. Anabolic response was defined as a change in whole body fat-free mass (FFM) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), appendicular FFM (by DEXA), and thigh muscle volume (by magnetic resonance imaging) during TE treatment. We used univariate and multivariate analysis to identify the subset of baseline measures that best explained the variability in anabolic response to testosterone supplementation. The three-variable model of TE dose, age, and baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level explained 67% of the variance in change in whole body FFM. Change in appendicular FFM was best explained (64% of the variance) by the linear combination of TE dose, baseline PSA, and leg press strength, whereas TE dose, log of the ratio of luteinizing hormone to testosterone concentration, and age explained 66% of the variation in change in thigh muscle volume. The models were further validated by using Ridge analysis and cross-validation in data subsets. Only the model using testosterone dose, age, and PSA was a consistent predictor of change in FFM in subset analyses. The length of CAG tract was only a weak predictor of change in thigh muscle volume and lean body mass. Hence, the anabolic response of healthy, young men to exogenous testosterone administration can largely be predicted by the testosterone dose. testosterone dose response; testosterone effects on muscle; predicting lean body mass response to testosterone; androgen receptor genetic polymorphism; polyglutamine repeats; polyglycine repeats TESTOSTERONE SUPPLEMENTATION increases fat-free mass (FFM) and muscle size in healthy, hypogonadal men (5,8,18,29,35,36), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected men with low testosterone levels (3, 6, 15, 16), and older men with low testosterone levels (19,30,31,33). However, there are striking qualitative and quantitative differences in this anabolic response to testosterone administration among the various studies. Of the six, placebo-controlled, clinical trials evaluating testosterone administration in HIV-infected men, two (11, 12) reported no significant difference in the change in FFM between the placebo-and testosterone-trea...