2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of a cartilage decellularized matrix scaffold for the repair of osteochondral defects: the importance of long-term studies in a large animal model

Abstract: The implants failed to produce reasonable repair tissue in this osteochondral defect model, although the CaP base in the -P group integrated well with the recipient bone. The study stresses the importance of long-term in vivo studies to assess the efficacy of cartilage repair techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These benefits promote the development of ECM-like matrices derived from molecular building-blocks, such as elastin-like polymers [139], peptide amphiphiles [140] or the commercially available Puramatrix (3DM) [141], that imitate the function and structure of native ECM. Empirical works in animal models of osteoarthritis have shown the beneficial impact of these constructs [142]. According to the gathered data, constructs containing matrices with cells were more valuable than matrices alone in treating defects [142].…”
Section: The Next Generation Biomaterials For Cartilage Tissue Enginementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These benefits promote the development of ECM-like matrices derived from molecular building-blocks, such as elastin-like polymers [139], peptide amphiphiles [140] or the commercially available Puramatrix (3DM) [141], that imitate the function and structure of native ECM. Empirical works in animal models of osteoarthritis have shown the beneficial impact of these constructs [142]. According to the gathered data, constructs containing matrices with cells were more valuable than matrices alone in treating defects [142].…”
Section: The Next Generation Biomaterials For Cartilage Tissue Enginementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical works in animal models of osteoarthritis have shown the beneficial impact of these constructs [142]. According to the gathered data, constructs containing matrices with cells were more valuable than matrices alone in treating defects [142]. Due to these benefits, generating treatment strategies using both constituents for articular cartilage regeneration/repair is more useable.…”
Section: The Next Generation Biomaterials For Cartilage Tissue Enginementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of smaller osteochondral constructs have been successfully generated using AM alone or in combination with conventional techniques, including casting, freeze‐drying and solvent casting/particle leaching . Even though the generation of a long‐term functional solution in osteochondral tissue engineering remains challenging, in vivo approaches with 3D printed osteochondral plugs have already been reported …”
Section: Mimicking the Layered Structure Of Native Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[101][102][103][104] Even though the generation of a long-term functional solution in osteochondral tissue engineering remains challenging, in vivo approaches with 3D printed osteochondral plugs have already been reported. 97,[105][106][107] There is now the opportunity to generate larger personal implants, as biofabrication can provide highly accurate anatomical structures 62,108-110 using different materials, either with 111,112 or without 113,114 the aid of a sacrificial support. Feasibility of this concept has been successfully demonstrated in rabbit models, for example, the manufacturing of total knee 72 and humeral head replacements.…”
Section: Improved Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 105 papers [ 54 158 ] were included in the systematic analysis. The data indicated that micro-CT was used only qualitatively in around 15% of the papers [ 63 , 74 , 75 , 79 , 95 , 102 , 106 , 108 , 112 , 116 , 122 , 129 , 133 , 146 , 149 , 158 ], and only quantitatively in 9.5% of the papers [ 55 , 78 , 83 , 85 , 98 , 111 , 125 , 131 , 137 , 155 ]. Micro-CT was used both qualitatively and quantitatively in the rest of the papers [ 54 , 56 62 , 64 73 , 76 , 77 , 80 82 , 84 , 86 94 , 96 , 97 , 99 101 , 103 105 , 107 , 109 , 110 , 113 115 , 117 121 , 123 , 124 , 126 128 , 130 , 132 , 134 136 , 138 – 145 , 147 , 148 ,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%