2013
DOI: 10.3167/gps.2013.310302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Usage of Online Collaboration Platforms by Parties: Strengthening the “Party on the Ground” or the “Party in Central Office”?

Abstract: Facing linkage problems, parties in Germany have started to respond to a changing media environment by reforming their internal structures of opinion forming and decision making, inter alia reacting to the rise of the social web and the successes of the Pirate Party whose party organization is to a large extent "digitalized". Whether and how established parties implement and adapt Internet tools, i.e., whether these could contribute to more participation of the "party on the ground" or whether they strengthen … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Internet in general and the Web 2.0 in particular—with the latter offering participative and collaborative structures—allow political parties to open up their internal processes of decision making and to reconfigure intra‐party democracy (Gibson, Gillian, Geffret, Lee, & Ward, ; Margetts, ; Scarrow, ). Nonetheless, the actual usage of such opportunities by the “party on the ground,” that is, the members and supporters, often falls short of expectations, with only a few people taking part (Hanel & Marschall, ; Larsson, ; Ward & Gibson, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Internet in general and the Web 2.0 in particular—with the latter offering participative and collaborative structures—allow political parties to open up their internal processes of decision making and to reconfigure intra‐party democracy (Gibson, Gillian, Geffret, Lee, & Ward, ; Margetts, ; Scarrow, ). Nonetheless, the actual usage of such opportunities by the “party on the ground,” that is, the members and supporters, often falls short of expectations, with only a few people taking part (Hanel & Marschall, ; Larsson, ; Ward & Gibson, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%