2006
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The unresponsive bystander: are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies?

Abstract: Previous research in bystander intervention found that the presence of other bystanders reduces helping behaviour in an emergency (bystander effect). This research was mainly conducted in the context of non-dangerous, non-violent emergencies. We hypothesize that the classic bystander effect does not occur in more dangerous situations because: a) they are faster and more clearly recognized as emergency situations; and b) higher costs for refusing help increase the accepted costs for helping. Following this line… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
172
2
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
17
172
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study in which the immediate danger of a situation was manipulated, the diffusion of responsibility effect held in the low immediate danger condition (Fischer, Greitemeyer, Pollozek, & Frey, 2006). In other words, when the immediate danger was low, individuals were more likely to intervene when there were no other bystanders than when in the presence of others.…”
Section: Diffusion Of Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a study in which the immediate danger of a situation was manipulated, the diffusion of responsibility effect held in the low immediate danger condition (Fischer, Greitemeyer, Pollozek, & Frey, 2006). In other words, when the immediate danger was low, individuals were more likely to intervene when there were no other bystanders than when in the presence of others.…”
Section: Diffusion Of Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Latané and Darley's seminal work on bystander behavior (1970) determined that individual's helping decisions increased if fewer people were present, other observers expressed concern, others were helping, and the individual was not in a hurry. Fischer et al (2006) found that individuals were more likely to help in group situations when the emergency was perceived as more dangerous. In studies of helping behavior in situations involving drug overdoses, fear of police was reported as a common reason for not seeking help (Tobin et al, 2005;Tracy et al, 2005).…”
Section: Helping Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Latané and Darley 1970: chapter seven. 37 Darley 1970 Schwartz and Gottlieb 1980: 311, Chekroun and Brauer 2002, and Fischer et al 2006 Karakashian et al 2006. 44 Latané and Dabbs 1975.…”
Section: Group Effects and Helpingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 Piliavin et al 1969. For additional studies, see Clark and Word 1974, Schwartz and Gottlieb 1980, and Fischer et al 2006. 53 Valentine 1980.…”
Section: Group Effects and Helpingmentioning
confidence: 99%