2015
DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2015.1044256
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bystander Intervention in Cyberbullying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(176 reference statements)
2
58
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, because managers hold authority over the performance appraisals and promotions of employees, bystanders often choose to tolerate bullying behavior out of fear that they will become the next targets, as participants in the present study did. Other studies have suggested that workplace friends tend to help targets in bullying incidents (Brody and Vangelisti 2016;Coyne et al 2016;D'Cruz and Noronha 2011). In the present case, however, the targets' friends were able to provide only limited and low-profile support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, because managers hold authority over the performance appraisals and promotions of employees, bystanders often choose to tolerate bullying behavior out of fear that they will become the next targets, as participants in the present study did. Other studies have suggested that workplace friends tend to help targets in bullying incidents (Brody and Vangelisti 2016;Coyne et al 2016;D'Cruz and Noronha 2011). In the present case, however, the targets' friends were able to provide only limited and low-profile support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Chen and Park () employed attribution theory to predict bystanders’ tendency to sympathize with either the target or the perpetrator. Other researchers have found that co‐workers who are close to bullying targets are more likely to intervene and support them (Brody and Vangelisti ; D'Cruz and Noronha ). However, bystanders’ good intentions toward targets may be hindered by the possibility of negative outcomes for bystanders if they become involved (Báez‐León et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A participant (female, 24) in a different group also had a similar opinion that, Beither they don't know these people or feel very far removed from the situation, but then there is probably another type of bystander where if a friend of yours is doing this you actually have some power to intervene.T hus, disengaged onlookers might become active bystanders to the bully or target when the person or people involved are considered close to the bystander, resulting in a perceived responsibility to help or intervene (Bastiaensens et al 2014;Brody and Vangelisti 2016;Van Cleemput et al 2014). However, as discussed under the BPerpetrator Perspective,p articipants expressed that a concern with intervening was that it could potentially exaggerate the situation, as the bystander may have misinterpreted the incident or Bput themselves in the limelight to potentially become bullied^(male, 21), or become a bully.…”
Section: Bystander Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, blurred boundaries between home, school and social life ‘presents further risks of exposure and reputational damage that seeps through from domain to domain, with resultant impact on emotional and physiological well‐being’ (Papatraianou et al ., : 278). With the added complexity of the interplay between technology, relationships, and bullying behaviour (Brody and Vangelisti, ), the challenges faced by schools are significant.…”
Section: A Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%