Elastic-Plastic Fracture Test Methods: The User's Experience 1985
DOI: 10.1520/stp34536s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unloading Compliance Method for Crack Length Measurement Using Compact Tension and Precracked Charpy Specimens

Abstract: The unloading compliance method has been used to measure crack lengths during the fracture toughness testing of an A508 Class II (Unified Numbering System [UNS] K12766) steel. It is shown that accurate crack length predictions (within ±4%) can be achieved by accounting for the extraneous compliance inherent in the testing fixture. Both precracked Charpy and 25-mm compact tension specimens have been tested over the temperature range − 150 to 300°C. From a comparison of the data, an assessment of the capability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relaxation in the composites should be more complex than that in the monolithic material. Sufficient relaxation time was allowed, otherwise compliance may be underestimated or overestimated (Gudas and Davis 1982;Neal and Priest 1985). For this purpose, the crosshead was stopped for 60 s before loading/unloading, and load relaxation was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relaxation in the composites should be more complex than that in the monolithic material. Sufficient relaxation time was allowed, otherwise compliance may be underestimated or overestimated (Gudas and Davis 1982;Neal and Priest 1985). For this purpose, the crosshead was stopped for 60 s before loading/unloading, and load relaxation was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The J-Aa resistance curves of EN3A steel in the as-received and hardened conditions are shown in Figs 2 and 3 respectively. The functions used to correct for extraneous displacements and evaluate both J and Aa were taken from Neale and Priest [7]. The J values were determined from measured initial crack length and not adjusted for crack growth.…”
Section: Resistance Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the crack growth due to stable tearing. dJ,/da is the slope of the resistance curve without concurrent fatigue and (dJ/dn), is the measured increment of Jper cycle evaluated from the change in the area under the load displacement record between fatigue cycles using the functions given by Neale and Priest [7]. Equation (1) was applied to the EN3A steel data and the results compared with the measured crack growth rates…”
Section: Fractographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test loading was regularly interrupted by 10% unloadings (Smith and Doig, 1986;Neal and Priest, 1986) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%