1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0095-4470(95)80165-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
171
2
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
19
171
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The sound symbolism literature shows an association between sour and back vowels (Simner et al, 2010) and between sour and high pitch (Crisinel & Spence, 2009;2010a;2010b;Simner et al, 2010). In line with this literature (and remembering that high pitch is intrinsically linked to vowel height; Whalen & Levitt, 1995) we found a similar relationship between sour and vowel height: intense sour ratings were predicted by inducer words containing a large number of high vowels relative to central and low vowels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sound symbolism literature shows an association between sour and back vowels (Simner et al, 2010) and between sour and high pitch (Crisinel & Spence, 2009;2010a;2010b;Simner et al, 2010). In line with this literature (and remembering that high pitch is intrinsically linked to vowel height; Whalen & Levitt, 1995) we found a similar relationship between sour and vowel height: intense sour ratings were predicted by inducer words containing a large number of high vowels relative to central and low vowels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…They are also linked to nonverbal aspects of sound, such as pure pitch. This will be relevant to the present study in as much as we shall be exploring whether tastes associate with vowel quality in synaesthesia, and there is an intrinsic relationship between vowel quality and pitch (i.e., high vowels such as [i] tend to have higher pitch -or higher fundamental frequency (F0) --than low vowels such as [a]; Whalen & Levitt, 1995). Hence, we briefly review part of this literature here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the current version of PENTAtrainer2 simulates only F 0 variations due to the normal target approximation process. It has not incorporated algorithms for simulating additional articulatory mechanisms, including, in particular, anticipatory raising (Gandour et al, 1994;Potisuk et al, 1997;Xu, 1999), post-low bouncing (Chen and Xu, 2006), consonantal perturbation (Silverman, 1986) and vowel intrinsic pitch (Whalen and Levitt, 1995). Of these, post-low bouncing has already been simulated in a separate study by adding an extra component added to qTA (Prom-on et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One systematic exception is [a] in Chinese and Korean, which were judged to be the largest. It may be possible that [a] is considered to be large because [a] generally has a low F0 (Whalen and Levitt 1995) (for the discussion of F1, see subsection 5.6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%