The United Nations Charter System and the Iraq Wars

Glen, Carol M.

doi:10.2753/pin1099-9922110401

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Results1

Pre-emption Redefined: the 2002 National Security Strategy1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2013

2014

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3 Eisai Ltd. European Knowledge Centre,Hatfield,UK,4 Eisai Inc.,Woodcliff Lake,NJ,5 GA Thompson Consulting,6 Science Faculty,Dept. of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Utrecht University,Utrecht,The Netherlands Background Lenvatinib (E7080) is an orally available multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic and antitumour activity (Matsui et al 2008;Glen et al 2011).To gain more insight into the disposition of lenvatinib, a mass balance study was performed in patients with advanced solid tumours.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Abstracts of the Dutch Society of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmacy Meeting of October 3, 2012

2013

Brit J Clinical Pharma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Abstracts of the Dutch Society of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmacy Meeting of October 3, 2012

2013

Brit J Clinical Pharma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The National Security Strategy made clear that the United States planned to deviate from traditional interpretations of self-defence (Glen 2009). The use of force for pre-emption can reasonably be called an act of self-defence only if it approximates very closely to the conditions under which force is used in self-defence.…”

Section: Pre-emption Redefined: the 2002 National Security Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Iraq War 2003 and the Issue of Pre-emptive and Preventive Self-defence: Implications for the United Nations

Kumar

2014

India Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The adoption of pre-emptive self-defence as a policy by the United States of America in its war against terrorism has revived the controversy over the concept of pre-emptive use of force in international politics. Some scholars argue that states are stretching the right of self-defence as pre-emptive, preventive and anticipatory in accordance with their needs and interests and to justify their actions. For others, in the context of changing security threats such as terrorism and Weapons of Mass Destruction pre-emptive strikes are permissible. These efforts to redefine and re-interpret the right of self-defence and use of force for justifying state’s actions have challenged the role of international organisations that were principally designed to regulate the unilateral use of force, and to maintain international peace and security. Against this backdrop, this article will examine how the pre-emptive and preventive use of force undermines the role of the United Nations in international politics through probing the case of Iraq War 2003. This would be a much needed reflection on the implications of Iraq War on multilateralism in the context of 10 years after the war.

show abstract

The United Nations Charter System and the Iraq Wars

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

Abstracts of the Dutch Society of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmacy Meeting of October 3, 2012

Abstracts of the Dutch Society of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmacy Meeting of October 3, 2012

Iraq War 2003 and the Issue of Pre-emptive and Preventive Self-defence: Implications for the United Nations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About