2021
DOI: 10.1093/cje/beab053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The unintended consequences of the regulation of cryptocurrencies

Abstract: This paper investigates whether the application of the latest guidance of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for regulating cryptocurrencies may engender unintended consequences at odds with the initial purposes of transparency and technology neutrality. For instance, we will ask whether regulation strengthening may incite a category of investors to flight to unregulated and non-compliant decentralised exchange platforms to stay under the radar of regulators. Furthermore, we ask whether regulation may lead… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the wake of the downturn in the cryptocurrency markets that began in earnest in 2022 that coincided with central banks raising interest rates, and the several high-profile blow-ups of several cryptocurrency exchanges and trading firms (e.g., most infamously FTX) that followed, the debate about the proper scope for supervision over this asset class has transitioned into a phase of a fevered pitch. The central question has been not only if but how cryptocurrencies should be brought under the supervisory umbrella, including which asset classes the various cryptocurrencies should be classified as (e.g., securities vs. commodities), but also possible unintended consequences of ill designed regulation (Sauce, 2022). In view of our findings, that there is a powerful interaction between cryptocurrencies and another major risk asset that leads to a self-reinforcing vicious cycle of bubble behavior, any such regulatory regime should account for these linkages.…”
Section: Introduction and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wake of the downturn in the cryptocurrency markets that began in earnest in 2022 that coincided with central banks raising interest rates, and the several high-profile blow-ups of several cryptocurrency exchanges and trading firms (e.g., most infamously FTX) that followed, the debate about the proper scope for supervision over this asset class has transitioned into a phase of a fevered pitch. The central question has been not only if but how cryptocurrencies should be brought under the supervisory umbrella, including which asset classes the various cryptocurrencies should be classified as (e.g., securities vs. commodities), but also possible unintended consequences of ill designed regulation (Sauce, 2022). In view of our findings, that there is a powerful interaction between cryptocurrencies and another major risk asset that leads to a self-reinforcing vicious cycle of bubble behavior, any such regulatory regime should account for these linkages.…”
Section: Introduction and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%