The uncertainty of seafood labeling in China: A case study on Cod, Salmon and Tuna

Abstract

Exotic marine fish products are increasingly appreciated in China. In this study, 100 samples of Cod, Salmon and Tuna products were collected from supermarkets in Shanghai, Nanjing and Hangzhou. First the information reported on the label were assessed in the light of the Chinese legislation, paying particular attention to the fish names and the geographical origin. Then, a comparative analysis of the official trade denominations adopted by five European countries (Italy, France, Germany, Spain and United Kingdom) for Cod, Salmon and Tuna was performed. Finally, the Chinese names of the species considered in the EU list were verified consulting the available international lists. Overall, 95% of the samples employed just generic names. In particular, 98% of Salmon and 100% of Tuna products were generically labeled while the labeling of Cod products was more diversified, even though 80% reported misleading or fake denominations. The results of this work highlighted the lack of a mandatory legislation on seafood traceability and of an official naming system. In particular, this study propose the introduction of a detailed Chinese naming system based on the Chinese Latin Dictionary for Seafood Names, following the EU approach. In fact, inaccurate labeling can have both economic and health implications for consumers as well as it may distort the true abundance of fish stocks. These drawbacks can be particularly serious considering the pivotal role of China in the global fishery industry

Advances in the analysis of complex food matrices: Species identification in surimi-based products using Next Generation Sequencing technologies

“…However, deficiencies in food labelling, particularly in products imported from Asian countries, have been often ascertained [29]. Therefore, the mislabelling rate involving the SBPs produced in Asian countries further confirmed the lower safety degree of these products, above all considering the absence of a standardized system for seafood labelling and traceability [30]. In this study, samples not reporting the presence of “fish” and/or “molluscs” on the label actually represent an health hazard for allergic consumers.…”

New provisions for the labelling of fishery and aquaculture products: Difficulties in the implementation of Regulation (EU) n. 1379/2013

“…Furthermore, also as regards the nutritional values, there are some little differences between wild and aquacultured, depending on environment and feeding. Finally, reporting the origin is not only important for traceability itself but also to allow consumers to identify local products or seafood coming from countries with low hygienic and quality standards [40] or from sea areas affected by pollutants and contaminants [41].…”

Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) identification in processed fish products using loop‐mediated isothermal amplification and polymerase chain reaction assays

“…10 So far, few investigations have been made in China, the world's largest fish consumer, where the demand for salmonids has been growing over the last few years. 11 For instance, Li et al 12 developed a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay based on growth hormone gene to screen salmonids in food. Moreover, Feng et al 13 established a duplex quantitative real-time PCR assay for the identification of S. salar, O. keta, O. nerka and O. mykiss.…”