The U.S. Federal Framework for Research on Endocrine Disruptors and an Analysis of Research Programs Supported during Fiscal Year 1996

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and Brogan & Partners are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Environmental Health Perspectives.The potential health and ecological effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals has become a high visibility environmental issue. The 1990s have witnessed a growing concern, both on the part of the scientific community and the public, that environmental chemicals may be causing widespread effects in humans and in a variety of fish and wildlife species. This growing concern led the Committee on the Environment and Natural Resources (CENR) of the National Science and Technology Council to identify the endocrine disruptor issue as a major research initiative in early 1995 and subsequently establish an ad hoc Working Group on Endocrine Disruptors. The objectives of the working group are to 1) develop a planning framework for federal research related to human and ecological health effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals; 2) conduct an inventory of ongoing federal research programs; and 3) identify research gaps and develop a coordinated interagency plan to address priority research needs. This communication summarizes the activities of the federal government in defining a common framework for planning an endocrine disruptor research program and in assessing the status of the current effort. After developing the research framework and compiling an inventory of active research projects supported by the federal government in fiscal year 1996, the CENR working group evaluated the current federal effort by comparing the ongoing activities with the research needs identified in the framework. The analysis showed that the federal government supports considerable research on human health effects, ecological effects, and exposure assessment, with a predominance of activity occurring under human health effects. The analysis also indicates that studies on reproductive development and carcinogenesis are more prevalent than studies on neurotoxicity and immunotoxicity, that mammals (mostly laboratory animals) are the main species under study, and that chlorinated dibenzodioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls are the most commonly studied chemical classes. Comparison of the inventory with the research needs should allow identification of underrepresented research areas in need of attention. Key words. carcinogenicity, developmental toxicity, endocrine disruptor, immunotoxicity, neurotoxicity, risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 106:105-113 (1998). [Online 28 January 1998] http://ehpnetl. niehs. nih.gov/docs/1998/106p105-113reiter/abstract.html In addition, the assistance of the following scientists was instr...

Human Pharmaceuticals, Antioxidants, and Plasticizers in Wastewater Treatment Plant and Water Reclamation Plant Effluents

“…The T‐22 water also contained a synthetic polycyclic musk; N,N ‐diethyltoluamide; nonylphenol; and benzophenone (Table 4). Nonylphenols are persistent degradation products of nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants ( Smith et al, 2000 ; Van Ry et al, 2000 ) and exhibit estrogenic activity in mammals and fish ( Lye et al, 1999 ; Reiter et al, 1998 ). Phthalates were present in T‐22 product waters from WWTP 1 and WRP 2 and in MF/RO product waters from WRPs 2 and 3.…”

Spermatogenic disturbance induced by di‐(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate is significantly prevented by treatment with antioxidant vitamins in the rat

“…DEHP is now regarded as an endocrine disrupter (Reiter et al, 1998;Mylchreest et al, 1999). However, there has been no direct evidence of an oestrogen-like action of the chemical (Nakai et al, 1999).…”

Vitellogenin Gene Transcription: A Relative Quantitative Exposure Indicator of Environmental Estrogens

“…These reports add to the growing body of studies already in print that provide evidence both for and against the role of environmentally persistent chemicals in endocrine disruption [5][6][7]. In 1998, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development published a research plan for endocrine disruptors [8]. In 1998, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development published a research plan for endocrine disruptors [8].…”