2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab77bd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Turbulent Stress Spectrum in the Inertial and Subinertial Ranges

Abstract: For velocity and magnetic fields, the turbulent pressure and, more generally, the squared fields such as the components of the turbulent stress tensor, play important roles in astrophysics. For both one and three dimensions, we derive the equations relating the energy spectra of the fields to the spectra of their squares. We solve the resulting integrals numerically and show that for turbulent energy spectra of Kolmogorov type, the spectral slope of the stress spectrum is also of Kolmogorov type. For shallower… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(24 reference statements)
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular the peak of the stress spectrum is to a large fraction composed of the tensor mode only. As expected from the work of Brandenburg & Boldyrev (2020), its spectrum follows a k 2 subrange to high precision.…”
Section: Energy Spectrasupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In particular the peak of the stress spectrum is to a large fraction composed of the tensor mode only. As expected from the work of Brandenburg & Boldyrev (2020), its spectrum follows a k 2 subrange to high precision.…”
Section: Energy Spectrasupporting
confidence: 65%
“…1-3 show a subinertial range proportional to k or k 3/2 , which is shallower than the generic k 2 spectrum. In the present case, the subinertial range is not long enough to make strong claims, but it is useful to recall that deviations from a k 2 spectrum of the stress have been found when there are departures from Gaussianity of the underlying magnetic or velocity fields [53]. Although the departures from Gaussianity may not yet be very strong in the present simulations, it is worth noting that real astrophysical magnetic fields have much larger magnetic Reynolds numbers and may well lead to much more significant departures.…”
Section: Runmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Additionally, it has been pointed out in refs. [95,97] that the spectrum of the stress becomes shallower than white noise when the turbulence field is non-Gaussian, which would lead to a shallower GW spectrum. In the case when the magnetic field is driven, the MHD evolution might indeed generate a stochastic magnetic field with deviations from a Gaussian field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[81]. This is a consequence of the k 4 Batchelor spectrum for a Gaussian magnetic (hence, divergenceless) field, which yields a k 2 (i.e., white noise) spectrum of the magnetic stress [81,95]. The small deviations from an exact flat spectrum, which increase towards negative slopes as we decrease the value of the fractional helicity, could be due to the small number of points in wave number space when we reach the largest scales of the simulation, as well as to the oscillations over time.…”
Section: Runs With Decaying Magnetic Field At the Initial Timementioning
confidence: 99%