The scalar, vector, and tensor modes in gravitational wave turbulence simulations
Axel Brandenburg,
Grigol Gogoberidze,
Tina Kahniashvili
et al.
Abstract:We study the gravitational wave (GW) signal sourced by primordial turbulence that is assumed to be present at cosmological phase transitions like the electroweak and quantum chromodynamics phase transitions. We consider various models of primordial turbulence, such as those with and without helicity, purely hydrodynamical turbulence induced by fluid motions, and magnetohydrodynamic turbulence whose energy can be dominated either by kinetic or magnetic energy, depending on the nature of the turbulence. We also … Show more
“…The GW energy of our runs scales approximately quadratically with magnetic energy. Following earlier work (Roper Pol et al 2020b;Brandenburg et al 2021b) we confirm a relation of the form E GW = (qE M /k c ) 2 , where q is the efficiency and k c is the characteristic wavenumber, for which the value k c = k * (1) has been used. The values of E M range between 0.002 and 0.02, corresponding to magnetic energy densities between 0.2% and 2% of the radiation energy density.…”
Section: Gw Efficiency and Scaling With E Msupporting
We present three-dimensional direct numerical simulations of the production of magnetic fields and gravitational waves (GWs) in the early Universe during a low energy scale matter-dominated postinflationary reheating era, and during the early subsequent radiative era, which is strongly turbulent. The parameters of the model are determined such that it avoids a number of known physical problems and produces magnetic energy densities between 0.2% and 2% of the critical energy density at the end of reheating. During the subsequent development of a turbulent magnetohydrodynamic cascade, magnetic fields and GWs develop a spectrum that extends to higher frequencies in the millihertz (nanohertz) range for models with reheating temperatures of around 100 GeV (150 MeV) at the beginning of the radiation-dominated era. However, even though the turbulent cascade is fully developed, the GW spectrum shows a sharp drop for frequencies above the peak value. This suggests that the turbulence is less efficient in driving GWs than previously thought. The peaks of the resulting GW spectra may well be in the range accessible to space interferometers, pulsar timing arrays, and other facilities.
“…The GW energy of our runs scales approximately quadratically with magnetic energy. Following earlier work (Roper Pol et al 2020b;Brandenburg et al 2021b) we confirm a relation of the form E GW = (qE M /k c ) 2 , where q is the efficiency and k c is the characteristic wavenumber, for which the value k c = k * (1) has been used. The values of E M range between 0.002 and 0.02, corresponding to magnetic energy densities between 0.2% and 2% of the radiation energy density.…”
Section: Gw Efficiency and Scaling With E Msupporting
We present three-dimensional direct numerical simulations of the production of magnetic fields and gravitational waves (GWs) in the early Universe during a low energy scale matter-dominated postinflationary reheating era, and during the early subsequent radiative era, which is strongly turbulent. The parameters of the model are determined such that it avoids a number of known physical problems and produces magnetic energy densities between 0.2% and 2% of the critical energy density at the end of reheating. During the subsequent development of a turbulent magnetohydrodynamic cascade, magnetic fields and GWs develop a spectrum that extends to higher frequencies in the millihertz (nanohertz) range for models with reheating temperatures of around 100 GeV (150 MeV) at the beginning of the radiation-dominated era. However, even though the turbulent cascade is fully developed, the GW spectrum shows a sharp drop for frequencies above the peak value. This suggests that the turbulence is less efficient in driving GWs than previously thought. The peaks of the resulting GW spectra may well be in the range accessible to space interferometers, pulsar timing arrays, and other facilities.
“…As already noted in previous studies [11,12,44], the GW energy spectrum from forced turbulence shows almost no or a rapidly declining inertial range for frequencies above the peak. This is because only the smallest wave numbers contribute significantly to the driving of GWs [44,68]. In fact, the GW energy h 2 0 Ω GW (f phys ) scales approximately quadratically with the ratio of magnetic energy to characteristic wave number k 0 as (qE M /k 0 ) 2 , where q is the efficiency (of order unity).…”
We revisit the big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) limits on primordial magnetic fields and/or turbulent motions accounting for the decaying nature of turbulent sources between the time of generation and BBN. This leads to larger estimates for the gravitational wave (GW) signal than previously expected. We address the detection prospects through space-based interferometers (for GWs generated around the electroweak energy scale) as well as pulsar timing arrays and astrometric missions (for GWs generated around the quantum chromodynamics energy scale).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.