The Tromsø Study: Artifacts in Forearm Bone Densitometry - Prevalence and Effects

Abstract

Suboptimal performance of bone densitometer, operator and/or subject may cause artifacts of consequence both for individual patient management and research. The prevalence and effects of such artifacts are largely unknown in densitometry. A cross-sectional population-based study was carried out of artifacts in forearm bone densitometry with single X-ray Absorptiometry (SXA) of the nondominant hand (distal and ultradistal site). After the screening, all scans were reviewed for artifact detection and reanalysis. The effect on the bone mineral density (BMD) result was found by comparing artifactual scans with a reanalyzed version or with normal repeat scans. All women aged 50-74 years, all men aged 55-74 years and 5-10% samples of other age groups aged >/=25 years attending the fourth Tromso health study were invited to have bone densitometry. The response rate from the background population was 80% (n = 7948). Fourteen percent of subjects had a movement artifact at either the distal or ultradistal site. The individual BMD variation was twice as large in scans with a movement artifact (0.94%) compared with normal scans (0.58%) (p = 0.0027). The radial endplate was inaccurately detected in 74% of the scans. Reanalysis of these scans led to a mean 3.8% decrease in the BMD value and an increase in the prevalence of osteoporosis of 10%. Artifacts were thus common, and their effects were clinically relevant in forearm bone densitometry. Artifacts and their effects need to be characterized in other bone densitometry settings also.

Smoking is a strong risk factor for non-vertebral fractures in women with diabetes: the Tromsø Study

“…BMD of the distal forearm was assessed in a subgroup of the women (n=2,905), and HbA 1c was measured in 2,747 of the women. BMD was assessed as previously described [14] using single X-ray absorptiometry (DTX-100, Osteometer MediTech, Inc., Hawthorne, CA, USA). A total of 111 subjects had repeated measurements.…”

Bone loss in relation to serum levels of osteoprotegerin and nuclear factor-κB ligand: the Tromsø Study

“…In both surveys, BMD of the distal forearm and ultradistal radius was assessed as previously described [25] with single X-ray absorptiometry (DTX-100, Osteometer MediTech, Inc., Hawthorne, CA, USA). All scans were reviewed in order to detect and correct possible artifacts, and systematic BMD differences between the two densitometers were adjusted before analysis [25].…”

“…All scans were reviewed in order to detect and correct possible artifacts, and systematic BMD differences between the two densitometers were adjusted before analysis [25]. A total of 111 subjects had repeated measurements.…”

Arteriovenous Fistula Affects Bone Mineral Density Measurements in End-Stage Renal Failure Patients

“…Care was taken not to measure lumbar vertebrae affected by local structural changes or artifacts, and special care was taken to avoid forearm artifacts (16). All scans were independently scrutinized by two of the authors, and nonusable measurements (e.g., prostheses of the hip or problems due to positioning) were excluded.…”