The tripartite model of relational efficacy beliefs in sport: a scoping review

Habeeb, Christine M.

doi:10.1080/1750984x.2020.1815233

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Specifically, we noted that players’ self-efficacy can be influenced by the confidence that they believe teammates have in them. These observations add to the findings from previous studies on relational efficacy in sport, which has shown that these efficacy beliefs predict a range of individual (e.g., commitment to one’s team) and group (e.g., team performance) outcomes (Habeeb, 2020). Our interpretations suggest that insufficient other-efficacy and relation-inferred self-efficacy among teammates can be detrimental to subsequent teamwork execution because players can become more tentative and engage in avoidance behaviors (i.e., trying to not make a mistake).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Why does teamwork execution breakdown? Experiences of university team sport athletes.

McEwan¹,

Crawford²

2022

Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Teamwork is a dynamic process that can fluctuate over a team's time together, including within a competition. The purpose of the present study was to better understand why this process breaks down, whereby teams do not demonstrate effective teamwork execution. To do so, 18 British university athletes (11 men, 7 women; M age = 21.4 years) from interdependent team sports were interviewed on two occasions and asked to describe experiences in which their team did not communicate, coordinate, or cooperate effectively during gameplay. Underpinned by a critical realist approach and through abductive thematic analysis, we developed seven themes (comprised of 16 subthemes) which reflected precursors to teamwork breakdowns. These included: (a) ineffective team preparation during training and during the pre-competition warmup; (b) ineffective team monitoring, problem solving, action planning, and conflict management during in-competition transition periods; (c) changes to the team's roster composition over the season and during games; (d) unhelpful leadership from coaches and athlete leaders during gameplay; (e) poor unity among team members regarding the team's instrumental objectives and social relationships; (f) problematic levels of confidence between teammates and among the team as a whole; and (g) poor performance of one's team and successful performances of one's opponent during the competition. The novel findings from this study extend current knowledge of teamwork and group dysfunction in sport and provide directions for future research on teamwork breakdowns. The potential applied implications for coaches and other team leaders (e.g., sport psychology consultants, and athlete leaders) related to these findings are also highlighted.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Why does teamwork execution breakdown? Experiences of university team sport athletes.

McEwan¹,

Crawford²

2022

Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While no studies included in this review explicitly measured or tested group norms, several studies do provide evidence to infer that group norms may influence the social identity and performance relationship. Research from Stevens and colleagues (2018;2020), for example, found that group identification was positively related to attendance, while Murray and colleagues (2020) found that athletes can internalize their team identity into their own self-concept, shaping individual perceptions. As such, social identification and group norms may work together to create an interaction effect which in turn helps shape the behaviors of group members .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Firstly, eleven studies used questionnaires based on the scale used by Boen et al (2008), De Backer et al (2011), and Doosje et al (1995. Three studies used the four-item scale of social identity (FISI; Postmes et al, 2013) to measure social identity (Lavallee et al, 2019;Stevens et al, 2018;2020), while only one study used a one-item measure to measure social identity (Campo et al, 2018). All of these measures assessed the emotional connection to a group or a team and did not contain any items that measured self-stereotyping and group homogeneity.…”

Section: Measurement Of Social Identity In the Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Social identity in sport: A scoping review of the performance hypothesis

Stephen

Coffee

Habeeb

et al. 2023

Psychology of Sport and Exercise

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Üçlü yeterlik algısına dair uluslararası alan yazını incelemesinde, bu modele yönelik çalışmaların popülerlik kazandığı görülürken (Habeeb, 2020;Stonecypher vd, 2019) Türkçe alan yazınında ise sınırlı sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır (Akın ve Aşçı, 2020;Akın ve Aşçı, 2021). Bu doğrultuda basketbolcuların üçlü yeterlik algısı ölçülerek mükemmeliyetçilik açısından değerlendirilmesinin alana katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Basketbolcularda Üçlü Yeterlik Algısının Öngörücüsü: Mükemmeliyetçilik

ÖZKAYA>

Engür

2023

Avrasya Spor Bilimleri Ve Eğitim Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sporcuların üçlü yeterlik algılarının, mükemmeliyetçilik algısı açısından incelenmesi araştırmanın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Türkiye Basketbol Liglerinde oynayan 426 (210 erkek, 216 kadın) gönüllü profesyonel basketbol oyuncuları oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmaya katılan basketbolcuların yaşları 22.60±4.66, spor deneyimleri 11.26±4.73 yıl olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada, Spora Özgü Çok Boyutlu Mükemmeliyetçi Ölçeği ve Sporda Üçlü Yeterlik Algıları Ölçekleri kullanılmıştır. Analiz sürecinde tanımlayıcı istatistiklerle birlikte, korelasyon analizi ve regresyon analizi (stepwise yöntemi) kullanılmıştır. Regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre; mükemmeliyetçilik algıları alt boyutlarından hatalarla aşırı ilgilenme ve kişisel standartlar, üçlü yeterlik algılarından; öz yeterlik ve diğer yeterlik alt boyutları üzerinde pozitif öngörü oluşturmaktadır. Üçlü yeterlik algılarının bir diğer alt boyutu olan ilişki temelli öz yeterlik açısından değerlendirildiğinde ise; mükemmeliyetçiliğin kişisel standartlar alt boyutu öngörü oluşturmaktadır. Korelasyon analiziyle elde edilen sonuçlar çerçevesinde; hatalarla aşırı ilgilenme alt boyutu, algılanan aile baskısı alt boyutu ve kişisel standartlar alt boyutları ile üçlü yeterlik algılarının tüm alt boyutları göz önüne alındığında, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve olumlu yönde bir ilişkinin olduğu ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları genel olarak değerlendirildiğinde; basketbolcuların mükemmeliyetçilik algıları, üçlü yeterlik algılarını olumlu yönde etkilediği söylenebilir.

show abstract

The tripartite model of relational efficacy beliefs in sport: a scoping review

Cited by 9 publications

References 41 publications

Why does teamwork execution breakdown? Experiences of university team sport athletes.

Why does teamwork execution breakdown? Experiences of university team sport athletes.

Social identity in sport: A scoping review of the performance hypothesis

Basketbolcularda Üçlü Yeterlik Algısının Öngörücüsü: Mükemmeliyetçilik

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About