1969
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-42-500-561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The treatment of tumours of the upper jaw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 5-year survival of 45% in this series seems to be at the same level. The histolopathologic pattern is similar to findings in other series (4,5 ) and the varied picture contributes to the complexity of deciding the best treatment modality for cancer of the upper jaw. The topographic distribution does not resemble two large series from the 1950s and 1960s, as cancer of the nasal cavity are almost 50% in the present series, compared with 20-30% in the older series (4,5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 5-year survival of 45% in this series seems to be at the same level. The histolopathologic pattern is similar to findings in other series (4,5 ) and the varied picture contributes to the complexity of deciding the best treatment modality for cancer of the upper jaw. The topographic distribution does not resemble two large series from the 1950s and 1960s, as cancer of the nasal cavity are almost 50% in the present series, compared with 20-30% in the older series (4,5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The histolopathologic pattern is similar to findings in other series (4,5 ) and the varied picture contributes to the complexity of deciding the best treatment modality for cancer of the upper jaw. The topographic distribution does not resemble two large series from the 1950s and 1960s, as cancer of the nasal cavity are almost 50% in the present series, compared with 20-30% in the older series (4,5). In general, the distribution of the two subsites has changed from a predominance of maxillary sinus cancers during the 1940s and 1950s to a predominance of nasal cavity cancers in the 1970s and 1980s (6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In accordance with other studies (2, 3) a good correlation between tumour staging and death ratio was found, especially in the systems proposed by the American Joint Committee (1) and LEDERMAN (7). The largest diameter of the tumour of the destruction as seen on the film showed, however, exactly the same correlation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There is no generally accepted method for clinical staging of tumours in the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity. Several systems have been proposed especially for maxillary sinus carcinomas (4,6,7), and another system has been based on the definition of T category of the maxillary antrum by the American Joint Committee (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel. Also, because the proportions cured C SLN , C TCR and C ACC in the models are expressed as fractions rather than as percentage rates the convention of using fractions is continued for overall survival (OSF) and cancer-specific survival (CSF) (Lederman 1964, 1967, 1971, Lederman and Mould 1968, Lederman et al 1969. The same data resource has previously been used to study lognormal distributions of symptom duration times (Mould et al 1987) and for Phase 1 SLN model validation for subsites of head and neck cancer (Mould et al 1976).…”
Section: Cancer Risk and Cure Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%