2018
DOI: 10.1080/13645145.2018.1470073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The travelling eye: reading the visual in travel narratives

Abstract: have all wrestled with the complexities of this relationship. Other thinkers and scholars such as Nelson Goodman (1976) and his "grammar of difference" (an analysis of the text-image boundary based on the structure and function of symbolic systems), W.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…What I proposed was, broadly speaking, an analysis of the way in which, within a travel narrative whose destination was North Korea, the photographs (those which were produced by Peixoto or found in newspapers or in museums, as well as those which were prohibited throughout the journey) act as complex discursive objects of the account as a whole. The narrator's commitment to sincerity and truth necessarily brings to the discussion "the relation between the seeable and the sayable, the visible and the articulable, display and discourse, showing and telling, perception and conception or symbol and concept" (Alù & Hill 2018, p. 2), which are still subjects to be theorized and questioned. With individual freedoms continually called into question in the "most militarised country in the world" (Peixoto 2012, p. 44), the only support left to the author was his memory.…”
Section: Concluding Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What I proposed was, broadly speaking, an analysis of the way in which, within a travel narrative whose destination was North Korea, the photographs (those which were produced by Peixoto or found in newspapers or in museums, as well as those which were prohibited throughout the journey) act as complex discursive objects of the account as a whole. The narrator's commitment to sincerity and truth necessarily brings to the discussion "the relation between the seeable and the sayable, the visible and the articulable, display and discourse, showing and telling, perception and conception or symbol and concept" (Alù & Hill 2018, p. 2), which are still subjects to be theorized and questioned. With individual freedoms continually called into question in the "most militarised country in the world" (Peixoto 2012, p. 44), the only support left to the author was his memory.…”
Section: Concluding Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images can evoke strong reactions, intimacy and memories (Abbott et al., 2013; Pittman & Reich, 2016; Van Dijck, 2008); yet, they are also constructed by a long history of art and photography, shaping current motifs, styles and content (Smith, 2019). The representations of activities or landscapes are not a simple reflection of reality, but carry ‘mentalities, ideologies and identities’ (Alù & Hill, 2018, p. 1). Urry and Larsen (2011) capture this in the concept of the tourist gaze, describing the way people look at the environment as a learned skill that ‘ orders, shapes and classifies, rather than reflects, the world ’ (Larsen, 2006, p. 245).…”
Section: Theoretical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debeljak (1998) ga označuje kot pisatelja, ki je v svojih zgodbah uspel prikazati boleče plati zgodovine. Paul Knaplund (1946) (Alú, Hill, 2018).…”
Section: Aktualnost Adamičevih Osrednjih Literarnih Motivovunclassified