The Transnational Circulation of Scientific Ideas: Importing Behavioralism in European Political Science (1950–1970)

Abstract

This article aims to deepen our understanding of the transatlantic circulation of scientific ideas during the Cold War by looking at the importation of behavioralism in European political science. It analyses the social, institutional, and intellectual dynamics that led to the creation, in 1970, of a transnational organization that aimed to promote behavioralism in Europe: the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR). Using qualitative material drawn from archives and interviews, the study shows that the creation of the ECPR was the joint product of academic, scientific, and political rivalries. It argues that the founding of the organization served a purpose for several agents (chiefly, academic entrepreneurs and philanthropic foundations) who pursued different strategies in different social fields in the context of the Cold War. More broadly, it suggests that the postwar development of the social sciences and the circulation of scientific ideas are best accounted for by mapping sociological interactions between scientific fields and neighboring social spheres.

Reception of experimental pedagogy and psychology in Chile. Analysis of the intellectual influences of Wilhelm Mann, 1904–1915

“…First, we analyzed Wilhelm Mann's transnational mobility and his contact with other experimental psychologists and pedagogues. Second, we analyzed the intellectual dynamics of theoretical reception through the intratextual citations found in Mann's work (Boncourt, 2015; Heilbron et al, 2010).…”

The EU and the social sciences: A fragile relationship

“…These three institutions arose from different constellations of interests, but all three were set up as 'side projects' to the EU. The Eurobarometer was designed by the marginal DG Communication, and the EUI and ESF were established as intergovernmental institutions despite their close relationship with the EU and their clear purpose of promoting European integration both scientifically and politically (Aldrin, 2010;Boncourt, 2015;Boncourt & Calligaro, 2017;Guzzetti, 1995). Still, all three came to play important roles in the social sciences in Europe.…”

Knowledge on a Democratic “Silence”: Conflicting Expertise on the Decline in Voter Turnout in Postwar Switzerland (1940s–1980s)

“…36 At a crucial time for the institutionalization of their disciplines, such a positivist perspective on political behavior assured Swiss sociologists and political scientists scholarly legitimacy, as well as being in sync with the behaviorist orientation of Anglo-American political scientists. 37 Beyond their varied sources of inspirations (Girod partly followed André Siegfried and the French tradition of electoral geography), they mirrored the preference expressed by their colleagues abroad for individual polling to better understand the psychological "motivations" of voters. Even if they had not spent part of their academic career abroad, it soon became imperative to quote international, at least French or German-speaking or, better yet, English-speaking reference works.…”