The Transformation of Academic Culture in Mainland Chinese Archaeology

Lu, Tracey L-D

doi:10.1080/1683478x.2002.10552523

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The policies of the Reform and Opening Up period initiated comprehensive economic and political reforms that had far‐reaching ramifications for Chinese higher education and research environment (Hua, 1995; Miller, 1996), and consequently, the development of archaeology, geology, and geography (Falkenhausen, 1995; Lu, 2002; Olsen, 1992). Although an anecdotal example, the number of Chinese scientific journals and articles directly related to geoarchaeological topics has significantly increased since the Reform and Opening Up.…”

Section: The Development Of Geoarchaeology In China: An Abbreviated H...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Geoarchaeology in China: Progress, trends, and perspectives

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Development Of Geoarchaeology In China: An Abbreviated H...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Geoarchaeology in China: Progress, trends, and perspectives

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…These changes reflect the larger cultural economic, social, political, and ideological transformation in China (Lu, 2006). During the Cultural Revolution, Taiwan stayed open to the world and aligned itself strongly with the Western biomedical model.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges of cross-cultural research: Lessons from a U.S.-Asia HIV collaboration

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many Asian countries have scaled up their research to combat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). HIV experts from the West have teamed up with these countries to assist in designing research protocols and providing necessary training. In this paper, we document the formation and maintenance of international and interdisciplinary HIV research collaboration among cross-disciplinary researchers working in the United States, Taiwan, and China. We conducted international social-behavioral HIV studies in several major metropolitan areas in Asia. Culturally sensitive issues that could be attributed to social and disciplinary differences have emerged throughout the collaboration process, including questions of who should be the research leader, where should resources be allocated, how should tasks be shared, which topics are valuable for investigation, and what survey questions are allowable. There is now a window of opportunity for greater international and interdisciplinary collaboration; however, for such collaboration to flourish, team dynamics in international research collaboration should be carefully identified and managed before studies are begun.

show abstract