The Tragedy of the Judiciary: An Inquiry into the Economic Nature of Law and Courts

Abstract

This Article explores the economic nature of law and courts as an explanation for the world’s endemic court congestion problem. The economic theory of goods and services is used to demonstrate that law has a dual nature—coercion and compliance—and that law as coercion is actually a club good that requires a complementary good to be useful, courts. But because courts are private goods in nature, the bundled product will behave as a private good. However, the unrestricted implementation of access-to-justice policies with the objective of increasing the people’s access to courts will transform the bundled product into a common pool resource. The counterintuitive result of this transformation is that granting unrestricted access to justice might actually prevent people from accessing their rights—the tragedy of the judiciary. Two policy implications are explored: The importance of legal certainty for the tragedy mitigation, and the potentially adverse selection problem resulting from court congestion.

Access to Justice for Illiterate Women in the Southern Char Areas of Bangladesh

“…Lack of financial resources to pay for legal fees is one of the main issues illiterate women in rural areas confront (Carvacho, Arriagada and Cofré, 2022). It is practically hard to navigate the legal system without expert aid because it can be intimidating and complex (Gico, 2020). Nonetheless, a lot of women require greater financial resources to get legal counsel (Koprowska, 2020).…”

Judge's Managerial Competences: a Case Study of a High-Performance Court

“…This institutional design tends to increase the judicialization of conflicts (Lunardi, 2021), which, alongside the redundancy, is enhanced by judicial intervention in areas of public policy (Desposato;Lannes, 2015). These factors contribute to the overuse of litigation and, consequently, the judicial system tends to perform ineffectively and take an excessive amount of time to adjudicate (Gico, 2020). Castelliano and Guimaraes (2023, p. 20-21) compare the court disposition time between Brazil and European countries in civil and commercial litigation.…”

The Supply and Demand of Justice: What Policy Implications from the EU Justice Scoreboard?

“…36ff. 41 Landes and Posner (1979), p. 248;Gico (2020), p. 649.The Supply and Demand of Justice: What Policy Implications from the. .…”